So, how about these idiots. All of them on level 0, terrible at Survivor, barely playing, no one ever going to make a power play, just gonna let Brenda and Sash play the middle and cruise through to the end. Oops.
Russell/Na Onka comparisons getting a little more appropriate, wouldn't you all say? Na Onka had an episode that Russell fans can appreciate, though the biased ones still probably hated her
I want to go off about how the Brenda boot proves that "being in control of the game" isn't nearly as good as gamebot fans think, while acknowledging that those who are edited as "in control" are often those with a fall in their future (editing tricks!), and how you guys need to let up on the hating of this cast, because they're not nearly as clueless as lots of posts ITT make them out to be.... But I'm gonna restrain myself.
Regarding Jane's over-the-top exaggerated positive edit: It's actually an indicator that she will NOT win. Going all the way back to Colleen in season 1 and Rodger/Elizabeth in season 2, the super-manipulated positive sweetheart edits never really win. Who got the most positive edit for a winner? The first two that come to mind are Ethan (And his edit was just kinda bleh), and Natalie (Who got hints of positivity all the time to contrast with the super-negative Russell, but never had it poured on her like your Cirie/Steph/Yau-Man/Jane types)
Also, the editors allowing 2/3rds of the season to build up for that Kelly Purple "You don't talk too much, do you?" joke was awesome. Last night was Kelly's breakout episode, can't wait to see more of her down the stretch!