Quote:
Originally Posted by SavageTilt
OT, but since we still have a few weeks until showtime, I thought I'd throw out a few questions that occurred to me:
- Did Yau-Man frame the truck deal with Dreamz optimally in Fiji? It seems like not making the gift of the car contingent on Dreamz handing over the necklace is placing far too much trust in a player who has already been shown up as unpredictable and willing to ignore promises. Why does Yau-Man not just say 'If we're both in the final 4 and you win immunity, I'll trade you the car for immunity' and added a clause that they not vote for each other in the final 4, for fear of losing each other's jury votes. As it is, backstabbing Yau gets Dreamz another $40,000 and a 60k car.
There are a couple reasons I can think of. One, Yau-Man wanted the deal to be locked in immediately. He wanted it to be impossible for Dreamz to back out (of the deal itself, not of following through on it). If Yau-Man waits, it gives Dreamz an opportunity to change his mind at F5 if he realizes, "You know what? I need immunity, so no deal." Two, it allowed Yau-Man to give up the reward and send himself to exile. I think he thought there was a small chance they would hide a second idol again, and he obviously wanted it/didn't want anyone else to have it. Three, I think Yau-Man is just a super nice guy who was more than willing to risk giving a truck to a poor kid who might stab him in the back. As long as he felt the angle was +EV, he was going to take it, even if that meant assuming a lot of risk.
Yau-Man.
re: the Danielle/Russell/Parv vote, we talked about it a lot in last year's thread. Yeah, they probably should have voted for Danielle instead of Parv, but it really just boils down to the fact that voting 3 on Russell and 3 on Parv works if Tyson doesn't level himself into switching his vote, so I don't think you can blame Rob for splitting it the way he did.