Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Survivor: GENERAL THREAD

04-25-2024 , 03:27 PM
Thought it was funny Q found a way to sneak another "cancel Christmas" in there this episode.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-25-2024 , 10:44 PM
so unbelievably bad by Hunter. Just play your damn idol and preserve your life in the game. He was also more likely to win an II challenge than anyone else, or to find a new hidden idol than anyone else. Never mind the fact that in modern survivor he can't even be directly voted out at f4, and is probably good at making fire.

Just crazy to me that he's saying he knew it was going to come down to Tiffany's vote but decided not to play it
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 01:15 AM
So bad. Quit asking people if they are with you and believing what they say, and instead think about what would be in their best interests. Play your idol. Easy game.

Any why is everyone so obsessed with engineering 'the move' and getting the credit? It seems as if you could go to someone and say I'm going to eliminate all your opponents and pave the way for your victory and the person would be like, hold up bro, I'd rather do this other thing that is not really in my interests but that I could claim as mine.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 03:29 AM
Hunter showed what happens to a lot of people. You can be smart and have good competition skills, but when it comes down to strategy, if you play emotionally you're screwed. After seeing what went on with Tevin, why would he think he could trust anything that anyone said to him? Just play the stupid idol.

Liz crying about her "move" being discounted make me hope she's a zero vote finalist because I can't stand her. It also confirms to me that she's definitely not the winner. If there wasn't a clearer edit for a winner than Kenzie I don't know who's ever had one. I'd be shocked if she didn't ship this and the editors would have pulled a serious fast one.

Q, Venus, Tiff all drawing dead. Tiff has been way too loud about everything. Have no idea where Ben will end up but final four has to be Kenzie, Charlie, Maria, Liz/Ben.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 04:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soncy
So bad. Quit asking people if they are with you and believing what they say, and instead think about what would be in their best interests. Play your idol. Easy game.

Any why is everyone so obsessed with engineering 'the move' and getting the credit? It seems as if you could go to someone and say I'm going to eliminate all your opponents and pave the way for your victory and the person would be like, hold up bro, I'd rather do this other thing that is not really in my interests but that I could claim as mine.

You know who had 0 'game moves' on their resume to claim?

A lady who won two times out of two called Sandra Diaz Twine
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringbckMichelleYi
You know who had 0 'game moves' on their resume to claim?

A lady who won two times out of two called Sandra Diaz Twine
Truthfully, she won the first one because Lil made probably one of the top 5 boneheaded moves in Survivor history by taking her to FTC instead of JFP. The second win she earned by making sure she was sitting next to two people the jury hated more. And she's played four times, not two - the other two times she was voted out in the middle.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 10:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyboy
Truthfully, she won the first one because Lil made probably one of the top 5 boneheaded moves in Survivor history by taking her to FTC instead of JFP. The second win she earned by making sure she was sitting next to two people the jury hated more. And she's played four times, not two - the other two times she was voted out in the middle.
Isn't the bolded a solid Survivor skill?
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh
Isn't the bolded a solid Survivor skill?
It's the best Survivor skill.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
It's the best Survivor skill.
Exactly my point. The overwhelming majority of winners, including Sandra who won the first two times she played didn't win due to a 'flashy resume'. They won by sticking their bum in a final tribal seat next to people less liked and/or respected than them.

This trend of claiming credit for moves mentality has only really started in the past few seasons and even then you get people like Xander who had clear 'moves' to claim and.... walked away with 0 votes

Last edited by BringbckMichelleYi; 04-26-2024 at 11:15 AM.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 11:56 AM
Hyper turbo survivor strat
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringbckMichelleYi
Exactly my point. The overwhelming majority of winners, including Sandra who won the first two times she played didn't win due to a 'flashy resume'. They won by sticking their bum in a final tribal seat next to people less liked and/or respected than them.

This trend of claiming credit for moves mentality has only really started in the past few seasons and even then you get people like Xander who had clear 'moves' to claim and.... walked away with 0 votes
I can think back to the original season where Richard Hatch sat there and told them point blank he outplayed and outwitted every single one of them including getting the majority of them voted out. And he was right, so they gave him the prize. Which IMO is how it should be.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyboy
I can think back to the original season where Richard Hatch sat there and told them point blank he outplayed and outwitted every single one of them including getting the majority of them voted out. And he was right, so they gave him the prize. Which IMO is how it should be.
But in s1, they all thought alliances were cheating and for most of the season, nobody discussed who they would vote for before tribal, other than the one guy who voted alphabetically.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 07:40 PM
I can't understand how Rob Cesternino is trusting Hunter's read on what happened last episode. Hunter got voted out with an idol in his pocket at a point in the game where it was in everyone's best interests to get rid of Hunter if they could make it happen...which they did. Obviously, Hunter's reads are flawed. He clearly could not discern what was about to happen nor what should happen if people are making decisions with their best interests in mind. The guy can do a puzzle, hang on a pole, toss a bag, balance and carry $#!%...I trust his judgement in all those areas. I do not put any stock in his ability to figure out or sway people's actions. No evidence to support he's competent in that area.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-26-2024 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soncy
I can't understand how Rob Cesternino is trusting Hunter's read on what happened last episode.
Cliffs on Hunter's read and Rob's view?
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-28-2024 , 04:51 PM
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 03:31 AM
Unfortunately it seems likely at this stage S47-S49 will be three more cut and paste new era seasons with S50 being New Era all stars.

In my realistic ideal world S49 would be a new era 'second chance' and the winner earns a place on S50 which is an all out legends season;
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 08:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
If they can scrape together enough returnees, it would be great to have three tribes of 7 - original generation (ie seasons 1-16), middle (seasons 17-33) and then new. Only way I could see three tribes working right off the bat is having even one more person on each tribe so that the numbers are odd right at the beginning. Would be great to see the variance in gameplay between the era based tribes I think.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 12:10 PM
Poor Hunter. Q cancelled his Christmas
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Maybe Jeff will add some senior citizen advantages.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Deal or no deal island still good
I've been catching up on this. Still have last week's episode to watch.

I'm sure a lot of player reactions to case numbers are for show for TV, but shouldn't the one playing the banker always want to knock out high value cases instead of low value cases based on the way the banker offers? The offer is always between the remaining values on the left and the remaining values on the right. If the goal is to find an offer higher than your case value, the more remaining values on the left, the easier your decision. And even if you make it all the way down to two cases remaining, it's still a pure flip. If you're playing the banker, staying in the game is way more important than how much money is being added to the prize pool.

Spoiler:
Also, I know $40k and $100k are decent money, but it's punting equity to take those deals and auto leave the game. Dawson took $100k and the total case value was something like $4.5 million and will continue to grow. Even if it stays at $4.5 mil with 6 players left, assuming he isn't the one eliminated here, his base equity is $750,000 with him accepting $100,000. Everyone has their own personal situation, but if I'm going for true life changing money, $100,000 wouldn't be enough for me to bounce. And sure, the odds are still way higher that Dawson leaves the game with nothing if he turns down the deal but meh. Obviously Rob and Amber have won a lot of money and parlayed their Survivor success into a nice life, but I know Rob wouldn't accept $100,000 in that spot.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheels2222
The offer is always between the remaining values on the left and the remaining values on the right.
The offer is somewhere in the middle between the top and bottom values regardless of where on the board they fall (it can be off by one in either direction). It just works out that often it is between the amounts on either side. What I'm not sure about is I thought they said the Banker doesn't know the value that the contestant picks. Is that true?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheels2222
Spoiler:
Also, I know $40k and $100k are decent money, but it's punting equity to take those deals and auto leave the game. Dawson took $100k and the total case value was something like $4.5 million and will continue to grow. Even if it stays at $4.5 mil with 6 players left, assuming he isn't the one eliminated here, his base equity is $750,000 with him accepting $100,000.
Spoiler:
Is the winner assured to win the final case amount? Or is it just one case on the board?
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 01:54 PM
Here I thought I didn't want to see more casts full of superfans and masterminds, but this feels like amateur hour. I keep thinking back to seasons where there were probably a handful of folks who were strategic and smart enough to have completely breezed through this band of dimwits. For sure my least favorite season since I started watching again, and that goes back to season 29!
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
The offer is somewhere in the middle between the top and bottom values regardless of where on the board they fall (it can be off by one in either direction). It just works out that often it is between the amounts on either side. What I'm not sure about is I thought they said the Banker doesn't know the value that the contestant picks. Is that true?
Spoiler:
Is the winner assured to win the final case amount? Or is it just one case on the board?
Your response made me realize I worded it poorly. I should have said, I can't recall an offer lower than the top remaining value on the left side, due to how lopsided right side values are compared to left side values.

I.e., let's say we start with 14 values. Let's say the player knocks out 8 cases in the first round and the remaining 6 values are $.01, $1, $250, $500, $100k, $500k. The offer is likely going to be between $500 and $100k. Your stay equity here is 67%. Even if it was $.01, $1, $250, $500, $750, and $100k, I think the banker offer will be between $750 and $100k for stay equity of 83%.

Let's say instead the 6 values remaining are $.01, $500, $100k, $250k, $500k, and $1 million, the offer is likely going to be between $100k and $250k. Your stay equity here is 50%. If the banker lowballs and goes between $500 and $100k, the stay equity is 33%. Maybe that could happen if it was something like $.01, $500, $75k, $100k, $250k, and $500k, where the banker offers between $500 and $75k.

To go further, let's say there are 3 values remaining. $500, $75k, and $100k. The offer is going to be between $500 and $75k. Stay equity of 33%.

Let's say instead the 3 values remaining are $250, $500, and $100k. The offer is going to be between $500 and $100k. Stay equity of 67%.

If I recall, the best stay equity offer I've seen was 75%.

Obviously there is some nuance, but generally, I think the playing player should always be rooting to knock out right side values. The banker's job is to get them to take the lowest offer possible, based on the remaining values on the board. I don't think the banker has any role in the players optimizing staying or being eliminated.

Whether the banker knows the case value, I don't believe he does, as that would give him an even more significant edge. But I could be wrong.

At the end of the day, it's all still completely random for what values are removed from the board, but I feel like we've seen some suboptimal decisions regarding stay and elimination equity.

Spoiler:
As far as the endgame, I'm guessing the final player will have to play a final deal or no deal game, so they aren't guaranteed the final case value. But the higher that potential final case value, I'm guessing, the higher their potential final offer. So yeah, my pure 1/6th of the current case value is probably not the correct equity calculation, but I still feel confident Dawson's equity was higher than $100k in that spot. Especially given it's possible he plays again and gets an even better guaranteed offer than $100k or some other type of reward. Season 1 of these types of shows are tough to play. If they do season 2, I'm guessing we will see some player adjustments. I'm interested to see how it plays out.

Last edited by tarheels2222; 04-29-2024 at 02:18 PM.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheels2222
Spoiler:
As far as the endgame, I'm guessing the final player will have to play a final deal or no deal game, so they aren't guaranteed the final case value. But the higher that potential final case value, I'm guessing, the higher their potential final offer. So yeah, my pure 1/6th of the current case value is probably not the correct equity calculation, but I still feel confident Dawson's equity was higher than $100k in that spot. Especially given it's possible he plays again and gets an even better guaranteed offer than $100k or some other type of reward. Season 1 of these types of shows are tough to play. If they do season 2, I'm guessing we will see some player adjustments. I'm interested to see how it plays out.
Spoiler:
This is one of the situations where I believe going straight equity is the proper way to evaluate what to do. Unlike poker, there's not another hand to be dealt or another tournament to enter. For most people this is a one time thing. If $100k is going to appreciably change your life for the better, you should take it every time.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote
04-29-2024 , 02:35 PM
I didn't realize Jeff has actually confirmed S50 will be a returnee season. Thought it was just speculation. Nice.
Survivor: GENERAL THREAD Quote

      
m