Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
yeah i think they even correctly pointed out in the ep that it doesn't really matter what one (or any) of the tv networks say, that isn't how elections are determined. and then the stakes are ... government approval of this merger? zzzzz
The thing is it does matter what the network says.
This election is clearly going to be close.
This election is clearly going to be contested no matter which side wins.
Ever watch sports and they do instant replay and say "you must have conclusive proof to overturn a decision"? If the network can get enough support in an unclear result to say "Mencken is the winner", then the job of Jimenez to overturn isn't just "well it kinda looks like...", he has to outright prove he would have won, which he can't do because the votes are destroyed. That means the only option is a re-vote, which won't happen - even if it's the fairest, a central tenet that people expect from democracy in the USA is that "when the election day is done, there's a winner".
So, by giving one side the platform and seemingly impartial support to say "based on votes actually counted, I win", and the other side having nothing other than "based on what we think might have been on some votes that were destroyed, I win", the former gets entrenched as the perceived winner in the public's eye.
Ironically, for all the thought that this was a callback to 2016, it's more like the reverse of 2020; it was a close election, and there were some voting irregularities claimed (note: I am taking no position on the veracity of these claims, just that they were made). However, at the end of the day, news organizations declared Biden as the winner, and despite a lot of support from some sectors and a lot of legal attempts, nothing Trump did after that was substantial enough to overturn it. That's exactly what will happen to Jimenez.