Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25
SA civil case would have a high chance of succeeding as per Oski ( the expert on this).
But you know, he had to settle to be able to have a least a decent chance to defend himself in Kangaroo court.
Perhaps they didn't fancy there chances against real lawyers.
I am aware that is what oski said but...
1) oski has admitted he hasn't studied this case or anything involving it outside of the TV show
2) has not provided reasons (at least not to me) why this case would have a higher pay out than several others identical to it. He told me he wrote a summary as to why but I haven't been able to find it itt, not saying it isn't there but I would like to see it.
3) hasn't responded or explained to me or anyone else why the other lawyers (including the one that worked on the SA civil case) we sent him a link to are wrong and he is right.
So although OSKI is a lawyer (I have no reason to believe this is false) his authority on this matter is not enough to convince me that hes right for those reasons. Simply him being an authority or an expert when several experts disagree with him is not justification for me to except hes right. Especially when you consider the clear logic that several others with very similar cases to SA get paid 3 million or less yet none that I can find get anywhere over 5 million.