I am aware that is what oski said but...

1) oski has admitted he hasn't studied this case or anything involving it outside of the TV show
2) has not provided reasons (at least not to me) why this case would have a higher pay out than several others identical to it. He told me he wrote a summary as to why but I haven't been able to find it itt, not saying it isn't there but I would like to see it.
3) hasn't responded or explained to me or anyone else why the other lawyers (including the one that worked on the SA civil case) we sent him a link to are wrong and he is right.

So although OSKI is a lawyer (I have no reason to believe this is false) his authority on this matter is not enough to convince me that hes right for those reasons. Simply him being an authority or an expert when several experts disagree with him is not justification for me to except hes right. Especially when you consider the clear logic that several others with very similar cases to SA get paid 3 million or less yet none that I can find get anywhere over 5 million.

Krolic, please calm the **** down. There are rules against talking to people here the way you are.

Cops are just people hired to do a job.

Post your evidence human nature has changed in the past few years.

LOL!

In the Good News file:

Wisconsin Governor Walker and Attorney General Brad Schimel defeated.

Opportunity for pardons in wrongful convictions under previous regime.

I believe this is BD best chance for a pardon...New guys seem like reasonable people who are willing to listen & look into a pardon.

Post your evidence Avery was framed twice & both he & Dassey were wrongfully convicted.
*tumbleweed after tumbleweed blows by*

In the politics thread Law & Order.. Go look at the last posted videos.... Hint there still getting away with beating civilians On camera. shocker I know.

He might have claimed $36m, but then people often claim interesting and imaginative sums. He actually settled for $400,000 and the county's insurers paid, as they were bound to. It is not likely that police officers either committed a murder or tried to plant evidence on an innocent man -- both life-destroying criminal liabilities -- in order to save the insurance company a spot of bother. Avery's previous conviction was due to misidentification by the witness, not police malfeasance.

Try again.....

SA 1st wrongful conviction was ALL on the mtsd. Period.

But hey having No dna, no eye witnesses or ignoring receipts & 17 eye witnesses for SA alibi did no deter them.

Oh & state police reports of GA.

No. You're just drivelling, I'm afraid.

No he hasn't. None of you murderer groupies seem to know what actual evidence even is & constantly conflate defence argument with it. None of you have provided any actual evidence to back up your whacky claims though. Nor will you be able to. Nor will Avery's shyster lawyer. You people are simply paranoiacs, conspiracy nuts and general cranks. Hence the reason you can't provide any actual fuhreelz evidence.

Even though Steven was exonerated there are still people derping along calling Steven a rapist.

They aren't saying he raped PB, nobody is disputing he was exonerated for her rape, disingenuous as ever, troll.

You don't need to sign your posts, we know who you are by this late date.

They have sad little minds, bro

I mean, look at fraley, he gets this gig during the "Thanks obama years" If only he'd held out for the big bucks in the griftosphere... ffs Candice Owens even got a gig.

Since your fighting Brexit too I'll politely disagree with you on this.... I've posted many links itt & lost all my bookmarks regarding the issues I pointed too in regards to SA 1st case.

P.B. made a quite convincing statement regarding the rape case after SA was released & I have no reason to disbelieve her after many years of thinking the incident over I'm sure again & again.

I ain't debating this out again, sorry.

If UK stays in EU, i'll answer more thoroughly for you.

Wat

Nah really you're driveling.Provide evidence Cuddles wuz framed for either rape or murder. Truth's on your side right? So should be easy to do. (I won't hold my breath as you groupies are all talk no action.)

You're dishonest & a troll- fact. Nobody ever said your hero raped PB as well you know.

Still waiting for you to provide evidence of this, still getting childish hot air noise from you. Again it's not required & your inability to grasp this salient fact is again your problem. Provide evidence to back up your waffle. Otherwise your bs is dismissed.

You're dishonest & a troll- fact.

If you actually read what I posted, you'd see I merely remarked that trolls call Steven a rapist despite the fact he was never rightfully convicted of rape.

Go back to your torture porn collection and rub another one out, maybe that will calm you down a bit.