So to clarify again for our non English speaking donkey avatar.

I was in a facebook group that I was invited to. This group was an avery guilty group. The group contained some people that were friends and family members of teresas. I didn't "go contact them". They just so happened to be in that group when I was invited to it.

The reason I was invited was because they saw me arguing with a truther in another Making a Murderer facebook group and asked me if I would like to join the guilty facebook group.

Wtf are you talking about? If you discovered Teresa had friends and family in this thread would that make you a "sick ****" too?

Can't cite cases then or imo your just a lazy troll....

You can **** right off too, troll.

Its too obvious that your a paid PR person for MTSO, probably the same firm that was PR for GWB during 9/11.

The guy is in prison with no chance of ever getting out. Why would Wisconsin waste money paying people to argue with conspiracy theorists on a poker forum?? LOL

I said it was established fact that Dassey raped Ms Halbach, not Avery. I said it's very likely Avery raped Teresa, not that it was established fact.

Not required for a rape conviction. Zero physical evidence against Louis Lamonica for multiple counts of child rape. He's still serving life though. (for yep multiple counts of child rape. Long before forensic DNA profiling was used as a crime fighting tool against suspects people were still convicted of rape. This was thoroughly covered already itt so you should catch up to speed, with respect.
Covered already itt & indeed in my very previous post to you.

You mean confessions, plural he confessed more than once & yeah I do put stock into it as it's supported by instances of fact & forensic evidence, again thoroughly covered already in this cospiraloon permeated thread.

Yet again physical evidence isn't required for a conviction. You mentioned snowlfakes earlier iirc. Is Dassey a special snowflake for you, despite your earlier comment? If so I'm dismissing that as illogical,if not then stop bar raising for Dassey. An admission against interest/confession's sufficient to convict a defendant in court (again covered ad naseam in this flavr-aid flavoured thread), see the aforementioned Louis Lamonica by way of an example.

No he isn't Dassey's IQ of 87 (higher than Avery's who's "exactly where he belongs" to quote yourself & evidently not regarded as ******ed by you despite his IQ being lower) has been also thoroughly discussed itt & his groupies' utterly inconsistent non-arguments in this regard (reads novels, goes to science class & can masterfully fool two seasoned detectives via logically inferring what they wish to hear but like totally ******ed, mind) caused no end of chuckles. Again you need to get up to speed mate.

???? In a word...no. (Where tf did you even pull that one from btw?honest question)

They should really really think before posting. But they're not conspiracy theorists, not at all...

It must have run parallel to the ****show run by law enforcement: Blocking professional forensic team, ordering lab techs what their findings should be, burial site ignored, route of victim discovered by scent dogs ignored, cover up for lying star witness Bobby Dassey, coerced confession from vulnerable teen, cops with conflict of interest always on hand to find 'evidence' unbiased cops missed, prosecution withholding exculpatory evidence from defense and jury. etc.

Because of the +30 mil civil suit?

I mean ffs are you really trying to gaslight that SA did't have a civil suit out against manti cops... lol. And since steve became the town star, you think that sat well with these cops/town officials. lol

Plenty of corrupt cops ' risk their careers, pensions, and freedom' to frame people even without being involved in a lawsuit that threatens their careers, pensions, freedom, and reputations. Sometimes it's racial bias, sometimes it's money, sometimes it's just because they're *******s.

And you seldom hear about them turning themselves in with tearful confessions because their being racist corrupt *******s makes them feel bad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seven_Five

The lawsuit is settled. You really think the state of Wisconsin is paying me to argue with other people who don't live in Wisconsin about a murder trial that is open and shut out of fear that he can somehow re sue them for 30 million dollars?

BTW, he wasn't ever going to get 30 million, he wasn't ever going to get 5 million...

Plenty of examples out there... I see whitey bulger just got got, but his FBI guy still doing time....
Look up the corruption in US state crime labs, that is truly shocking...

Geez No ****ing wonder you guys elected the criminal in chief.....At least we get to laugh at his tax returns soon enough, Oh lordy.

Thanks to the folk who voted dems for the house, y'all saved the world from a bullet, I believe.

Bye bye Scott Walker.

^^fake news.

Please show me a comparable case where someone received 5 million under similar circumstances. I can show you a bunch where people have received 1-3 million.

Keep grifting fraley, your doing great. Maybe you get on that rightwing griftosphere soon where the big bucks are.

Prove it ya lazy ****head.

..

Perhaps what I said wasn’t really “fake news” after all.

Sez the guy lying his ass off that Dassey's "practically ******ed" while saying Avery's exactly where he belongs despite his IQ being lower than Dassey's(but no claims of ******ation for him I see), to go with your bar raising re burden of proof for your special little snowflake Dassey. Your psychological projection is your problem not mine even if I do find it entertaining personally.

Never said it was Forrest, I said it was est fact that Dassey was a rapist. Try to keep up.

Good for you, me too.

Cite verbatim where the court establishes as fact that Dassey's clinically ******ed or else stop making sh*t up as nobody sane is interested in your falsehoods or your childish obstinacy either.

. Covered already itt not rehashing it except to state that I asked invited& outright challenged Dassey's fan club for specific inarguable unequivocal examples of coercion & got zero zip bupkas niente nada each & every time. Honest question- do you think this thread began with your very limited posting history? It didn't. Stop rehashing stuff that was already covered a bazillion times as nobody is here to rinse repeat for your amusement or to bring you up to speed.
As to the rest of your post, yet again for the nth time itt an admission against interest is considered sufficient enough to convict you in a court of law & nothing else you say has to be consistent
Again get up to speed & stop rehashing crap that was already covered & thoroughly refuted & debunked. Stop raising the bar for murderers rapists & mutilators too.Thanks.

Jasus you're thi...*bites lip*

...that is to say, Well Krolik the reason it's "established fact" that Dassey is a rapist is because he got arrested then had to go to this building called a "court". At this "court" he had what's called "a trial".

Now at this "trial", Dassey's defence said he wasn't a rapist mutilator & murderer but the prosecution said he was. Now there were also 12 people who listened to all the arguments & studied all the evidence against him who were collectively called "a jury"". Dassey was then "convicted" of rape murder & mutilation. Ergo it's now "established fact" that Brendan Dassey is a filthy scummy low life rapist nonce. It's one of three reasons (the other two being he's also a "convicted" murderer & mutilator.)
It's why he's in prison without parole for 41 years... do you see how that works mate?

Also you haven't a scooby doo what "evidence" even means. If there actually were ...then it wouldn't have been even possible to arrest him never mind arrest try & convict him. (which is yet another thing again already thoroughly covered in this rather long thread btw) See my helpful pointer re an admission against interest being sufficient to convict you in a court of law (still bar raising I see as I guess an admission against interest, enough for you me & anyone else just isn't enough for Special Snowflake Dassey )

So in conclusion you're not very bright. It's why I helpfully emboldened the important bits for you in my reply & you're welcome as I live to give. And if you need to raise bars in order to defend murderers rapists & mutilators, then you don't have a case to make here.

If I remember correctly dassey scored just slightly below average on cognitive abilities and retaining/understanding information. Where he scored very low was communication. I maybe wrong though.

SA civil case would have a high chance of succeeding as per Oski ( the expert on this).
But you know, he had to settle to be able to have a least a decent chance to defend himself in Kangaroo court.
Perhaps they didn't fancy there chances against real lawyers.

lol As I said, just a lazy turd of a boy.