Lol hadn't logged in & came across this gem from our saucy friend & it was just too funny to pass up & ignore.
Quote:
You do understand that demands for such things are the hallmarks of a shill, right?
Asking someone to provide proof of their whacky claims is the hallmark of a shill okay. Whom am I shilling for Saucy? Precisely? And for what purpose/agenda?
Quote:
There is no "verbatim" transcript where the court accepted the shell was contaminated.
I know.
Quote:
Nor is there verbatim anything that you have demanded.
This I also know.
Quote:
Had there been, SA would not be in jail, there'd be no MaM and no 2+2 thread.
This is yet another thing I know. It's why I was
extraordinarily confident making my request.
Quote:
"Show me proof that the court agrees with your argument" is ridiculous. The argument exists BECAUSE the court did not agree.
Ah but you're conflating a lost argument for contamination with
actual evidence for contamination..which is why nobody with an IQ exceeding double digits entertains your fallacies for so much as a nanosecond. Do you finally see?
Nobody is interested in your conflation & repetition of already failed arguments as it's not that far removed from a proof by assertion fallacy, really. Spam iow.
Now when you have actual fuhreelz no foolin'
valid objective examples for corruption contamination & coercion (which all appeared to occur parallel to each other), then your adherence to already failed arguments can be comfortably dismissed.
Do you see now why you & Loony Loudz are on ignore? Nothing but fallacies & irrelevant objections from you Pizzagaters.