Quote:
Originally Posted by eddymitchel
Woosh
What evidence place the killing inside. Once you admit nothing but the botched test results what evidence place the murder on the property.
Again you have zero evidence that the evidence was botched, just the control sample.
I've just listed several samples of evidence that place the murder on the property. You apparently disagree it's evidence which is your prerogative. I otoh agree with the verdict & accept the submitted evidence.
Yet again you're attempting to rehash. Same as I've seen other supporters do in other cases & indeed on other threads on this very site.
Here's what's relevant atm wrt The Railroaded Ones:
The merits of the majority's argument vs Hamilton's, re Dassey.
Whose argument is more accurate& correct wrt interpreting the law
Whether or not Zellner's latest motions to reconsider etc have anything valid in them, which could get a reversal & lead to Cuddly Steve getting a retrial.
In terms of simple debate the only relevant thing is whether or not advocates for the murderers can justify the Docu Twins Crapflix piece as in plausibly explain why they needed to engage in such deception, which has already been highlighted itt.
The actual evidence phase is over years now, it's not up for debate if you're gonna engage in the same failed argument that the defence did, essentially.
Things which you personally don't consider evidence aren't nullified in an objective sense because you personally disagree with it, & by "you" I mean collectively. You all need to stop conflating your personal beliefs or criteria with objective evidence & standard criteria.
Otherwise none of you will be taken seriously as you'll simply come across as unreasonable, with an emotional attachment to murderers & rapists, hence your inability to provide actual evidence for your beliefs.
Last edited by corpus vile; 11-14-2017 at 01:22 PM.