Making a Murderer
09-08-2016
, 04:12 AM
09-08-2016
, 06:02 AM
09-08-2016
, 09:10 AM
09-08-2016
, 09:23 AM
Quote:
That's certainly possible, and of course there's no way of knowing whether that affected her decision or not (perhaps even SC doesn't know).
However, regardless of whether or not bias affected her decision to request the deviation of protocol, the fact is that SC had legitimate reasons for requesting it and her request for a deviation from protocol was approved. Furthermore, as Griesbach states, no defense expert challenged SC's explanation of why the results were still valid.
However, regardless of whether or not bias affected her decision to request the deviation of protocol, the fact is that SC had legitimate reasons for requesting it and her request for a deviation from protocol was approved. Furthermore, as Griesbach states, no defense expert challenged SC's explanation of why the results were still valid.
09-08-2016
, 01:39 PM
09-08-2016
, 05:02 PM
Yet señorita Culhane A) confirms with naked eye that there is so little DNA that only ONE test would ever be able to be performed. B) Contaminates the one and only test that will ever be performed C) DOES NOT got proper authority to deviate from protocol to submit the results. D) Admits that she was ordered by Fassbender as to what the results of these tests should be.
I mean wtf? Only the most important test in the entire case that sentenced TWO people to essentially their whole lives in jail.
Meanwhile, Poorshillz and Greaseback are attempting to profit off of books that defend this person and her deplorable acts.
Last edited by lostinthesaus; 09-08-2016 at 05:08 PM.
09-08-2016
, 05:14 PM
09-08-2016
, 06:01 PM
09-08-2016
, 06:27 PM
09-08-2016
, 07:25 PM
09-08-2016
, 07:31 PM
Here is a contemporary account of Culhane's performance in court:
Quote:
Two disturbing pieces of information came out. First, there was an email from the Special Prosecutor Ken Kratz to Culhane on how to deal with the contamination problem. This email was not submitted as evidence. It was presented as a matter for concern.
The second item was a direction from Special Agent Tom Fassbender to Sherry Culhane directing her to place Teresa Halbach in Avery’s Home and garage. This reminiscent of the Oklahoma City scandal involving the same behaviors from detectives who wanted to slant a case. Detectives would tell a veteran forensics supervisor, Joyce Gilchrist, who they suspected and magically the evidence, along with her sworn testimony, would match the desired suspect.1
It seems to me the attempt to direct laboratory results is at least, a great lapse in ethics. Further, this will have the effect of clouding the work of persons in the crime lab. In this case, due to irregularities in the analysis of a bullet fragment, this has a direct impact. This also demonstrates that like Sheriff Tom Kocourek in the false conviction case, the special investigator, and others, had determined who they wanted for the crime and pushed to make the evidence fit.
Culhane’s error rate was shown to be the highest of her group although her analysis time was seventy percent of the other analysts. She explained this by stating she did more samples than others. This is damaging since she was claiming high output as an excuse for errors; even errors that lead to false convictions. In addition, there were 350 items to be tested, a very high number for the lab.
The second item was a direction from Special Agent Tom Fassbender to Sherry Culhane directing her to place Teresa Halbach in Avery’s Home and garage. This reminiscent of the Oklahoma City scandal involving the same behaviors from detectives who wanted to slant a case. Detectives would tell a veteran forensics supervisor, Joyce Gilchrist, who they suspected and magically the evidence, along with her sworn testimony, would match the desired suspect.1
It seems to me the attempt to direct laboratory results is at least, a great lapse in ethics. Further, this will have the effect of clouding the work of persons in the crime lab. In this case, due to irregularities in the analysis of a bullet fragment, this has a direct impact. This also demonstrates that like Sheriff Tom Kocourek in the false conviction case, the special investigator, and others, had determined who they wanted for the crime and pushed to make the evidence fit.
Culhane’s error rate was shown to be the highest of her group although her analysis time was seventy percent of the other analysts. She explained this by stating she did more samples than others. This is damaging since she was claiming high output as an excuse for errors; even errors that lead to false convictions. In addition, there were 350 items to be tested, a very high number for the lab.
09-08-2016
, 09:34 PM
09-08-2016
, 09:41 PM
09-08-2016
, 10:50 PM
Quote:
I take offense to this entire thread. I am usually the drunk guy and everybody always picks on the drunk guy...till we take all your chips...thats when the fun usually begins.
Buncha crybabies,,this aint church.
Funny hearing poker degenerates talk about the drunk degenerates.
Buncha crybabies,,this aint church.
Funny hearing poker degenerates talk about the drunk degenerates.
