Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Making a Murderer Making a Murderer

04-04-2016 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
I honestly do not know who carla chase is.. The group I was in didn't have anyone by that name that i recall.

All the rest of the stuff is just silly conclusion from a person who cant handle the truth and I won't be responding to it. Project your problems on someone else.
Keep avoiding lOl, you have the same personality as Sherry(Burp!!! Excuse me)Culhane & inject yourself were you are not welcome, I.E SA Support group's.
Have the same misguided belief's that Pam Strum has.
And you have a similar attitude to a P.D. in a small corrupt county,(Don't ask Questions, you are Guilty).

And are still using 'suspects' to support your misguided opinions. lOl But don't ask Questions.

Are you sure you live in USA#1 or is it really Russia or S.A. I think we now need this verified by mods.
Or can you post a newspaper with the date on it the day you post & a 2+2 post of your choice pls with the corrasponding date as the Newspaper, or a message that say's
Spoiler:
**** you smacc

Last edited by smacc25; 04-04-2016 at 06:28 PM.
04-04-2016 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkasigh Making a Murderer

Also it's not just him - if they would have interrogated him and validated his alibi, they would have logically had to do the same for any number of her acquaintances and past, present, or prospective romantic partners - that's a lot of effort for no particular benefit.

Once her car is found on the same property where she was last seen, an ex-boyfriend (unless he happened to have some connection to that property) is no longer the most likely suspect.
They can investigate whomever they want.

He is not just a random ex-boyfriend. He was at her house dropping "something" off at an undisclosed time. He was an integral part of the search team. He was accessing her voicemail.

I agree that he is not the most likely suspect after a car was found. That does not preclude him from still being considered a suspect or grant him immunity to be physically present at the alleged crime scene.
04-04-2016 , 06:55 PM
Dem Bones again.
It has been stated that it is easier to Collect a 'Blood type' match when bones are so degraded that you cannot use them for DNA analysis.

Does anyone have info/source on this at hand?
I am also wondering if the Bones can be carbon dated or another process to verify the age/date of the remains.
04-04-2016 , 06:57 PM
Lol. carbon dating can't give you precise dates like that. Even if it could, where do you think these bones came from?

You are beginning to become a parody of yourself smacc.
04-04-2016 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeotaJMU Making a Murderer
Are you instigating there was a 40 acre perimeter of police officers that all had log books?


There was only one log and it was on the property. You can't believe the place was that secured when lenk was able to log out but never log in to begin with.
Yeota -

I don't think you know what the word 'instigating' means.
04-04-2016 , 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt Making a Murderer
They can investigate whomever they want.

He is not just a random ex-boyfriend. He was at her house dropping "something" off at an undisclosed time. He was an integral part of the search team. He was accessing her voicemail.

I agree that he is not the most likely suspect after a car was found. That does not preclude him from still being considered a suspect or grant him immunity to be physically present at the alleged crime scene.
Ikasigh is now just flinging mud hopping that we have never discussed it before & then appears to tell seasoned FBI investigators(Moore to the story) how they should not waste important Hrs investigating friends or Ex bf/gf.

Are you also saying Ikasign that in the USA#freedom that peeps should also not be asking Questions of the peeps close to T.H. & when they give No answers. ("I don't know what time I seen T.H. at but it was Sunday" R.H.)

Ikasigh do yourself a favor & 'Read the Transcripts', I'm just saying.
04-04-2016 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
Lol. carbon dating can't give you precise dates like that. Even if it could, where do you think these bones came from?

You are beginning to become a parody of yourself smacc.
I will need verification on this remark, Link/source pls?

But KZ can get a blood type from the Bones, if they are still around.
04-04-2016 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25 Making a Murderer
Lets get 1 thing st8 Fraley, I am not implying anything.

I AM STRAIGHT OUT SAYING IT.

D. You said that you joined Carla Chase FB page, so you sought it out.(STALKER) And have since joined a Halbach family support group. JEEZ.
(now you write 'Friends group'. PLEEAASSEEEEEE.
E. You implied that no one asked in court(wrong, the denny rule did not allow for this line to be taken). YOU implied that RH DID NOT check T.H. voicemail, we say differently as by simple logic we deduce that when R.H. choose to look up T.H. Phone records & later when it was discovered some voicemails were erased then we deduce that it was R.H. & you said NO IT WAS NOT HIM, THEREFORE implying that YOU know what R.H. does, thinks.

You are a criminal who likes snuff movies, FACT(not implying)
You sought out F.B. Groups connected to the T.H. Case & found a SA Support F.B. Page & joined in (STALKER). FACT-Not Implying
You lie About knowing R.H. Movements(why would you do this)
YOU imply that we are 9/11 Truthers, WHEN IN FACT YOU ARE THE 1 GUY in here who has posted more than anyone else, respond to every post that does not fit your agenda.(in line more so to Truthers/conspiritards than Us aNot Guilty crown).
Are paranoid about FACTS you put in here & then try to defend these remarks as normal. FACT-IT IS NOT NORMAL TO LOOK AT PEOPLE GETTING KILLED.
You also answer ppl posts WHO ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR AN ANSWER.(more in line with 9/11 truthers).

Pls do me a favor Do Not Visit Glasgow, Scotland as we have our fair share of Crazies in our city.
You're insane.
04-04-2016 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25 Making a Murderer
It's no surprise that the #guilty don't respond to this claim. I would love to see them refute this evidence that the Coroner who identified T.H. was not a M.D.
Tbh It does not surprise me the way the Death Certificate was written, and how could he know it was T.H. when she was not even identified until Mid January.
Yup #guilty seem to have No Answers for these events.

The County Coroner was banned because of a conflict of interest because she came from mantiowoc bit the MCSD also went after her licence because she refused to sign of on a report of who killed a hit & run victim & with the way they operate in MC it is no surprise that she resigned her post & moved away further her career as A Honest M.D.
It will be lumped into who cares what a certificate says.

It is odd that he represents himself as a doctor when he is in fact a nurse. In a high-profile case like this, you would definitely have an MD perform an autopsy (if possible) and assess a homicide.

There is a high-likelihood that the coroner may have to testify at a trial. You want an MD on the stand.

http://county.milwaukee.gov/StaffListing22954.htm

They could have brought in someone from Milwaukee. All the top people are MDs.
04-04-2016 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngerPush Making a Murderer
Yeota -

I don't think you know what the word 'instigating' means.
So tell me again how R.H. was not on the Avery property?
04-04-2016 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt Making a Murderer
It will be lumped into who cares what a certificate says.

It is odd that he represents himself as a doctor when he is in fact a nurse. In a high-profile case like this, you would definitely have an MD perform an autopsy (if possible) and assess a homicide.

There is a high-likelihood that the coroner may have to testify at a trial. You want an MD on the stand.

http://county.milwaukee.gov/StaffListing22954.htm

They could have brought in someone from Milwaukee. All the top people are MDs.
Yeah but that would imply that they were using professionals & we know MCSD does not do that. (see my post wrt the Bones getting shoveled into a sifting machine)
04-04-2016 , 07:18 PM
04-04-2016 , 07:19 PM
Cannot verify the source to those docs. I saw them online but that is supposedly the underage girl that claimed SA raped her.
04-04-2016 , 07:24 PM
04-04-2016 , 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngerPush Making a Murderer
You're insane.

Hey I am not the ONE watching snuff/stuff, or stalking F.B. or talking for R.H. But I am advocating for Freedom of speech unlike some.

#Don't ask Questions.

Lesson learned I guess, Don't talk to crazzzys.

I thought 1 of the most important thing about living in a democracy is that you get to ask as many questions as you like. Don't you agree AngerPush.
04-04-2016 , 07:28 PM
Smacc, idk if it is a language barrier or if you are just intentionally misrepresenting stuff I have said but its getting annoying. I never said you couldn't ask questions. I was comparing the way you present your arguments with truthers. You guys refuse to make any claims, you just ask questions. When we don't know an answer or there is a gap and knowledge you scream SEE! When a question is answered you ignore the answer.
04-04-2016 , 07:30 PM
Also for the love of god. Quit saying I was stalking people. I was in a group that had her friends. I was invited to this group, not by her friends by someone else. That is how I talked to them. I talked to them in the group. I didn't seek them out. And yes, I will defend RH and others who are now being victimized and harassed by people thanks to this propaganda.

Its not like they can come out and speak without being instantly attacked. I stick up for my fellow man who is wronged.
04-04-2016 , 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
smacc,

carbon dating and how it works:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ar/cardat.html
Cool, Thx. I guess carbon dating is out then, lOl. But the Blood Type is still in play huh?


Wrt those document's, I ain't gonna bother trying to verify them the now as SA has not been charged with this crime.

18
Under Wisconsin law, the age of consent is 18. Consensual sexual contact with a person 16 or 17 years of age is a “criminal offense,” albeit a misdemeanor only.13 Apr 2011
04-04-2016 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25 Making a Murderer
Cool, Thx. I guess carbon dating is out then, lOl. But the Blood Type is still in play huh?


Wrt those document's, I ain't gonna bother trying to verify them the now as SA has not been charged with this crime.

18
Under Wisconsin law, the age of consent is 18. Consensual sexual contact with a person 16 or 17 years of age is a “criminal offense,” albeit a misdemeanor only.13 Apr 2011
Thats cool and all but according to her she didn't consent. So its rape.
04-04-2016 , 07:36 PM
Besides, most states have incest laws. If you are a relative who can be viewed as an authority having sex with an underage relative is considered incest and I believe in my state anyway it is a class C felony which carries 10 years in prison with 7 years mandatory.

So he would have been charged with rape and incest. That would get him almost 40 years where I live with 20 or so years mandatory.
04-04-2016 , 07:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
Smacc, idk if it is a language barrier or if you are just intentionally misrepresenting stuff I have said but its getting annoying. I never said you couldn't ask questions. I was comparing the way you present your arguments with truthers. You guys refuse to make any claims, you just ask questions. When we don't know an answer or there is a gap and knowledge you scream SEE! When a question is answered you ignore the answer.
Wrong.
I have stated as my opinion that I believe GZ is the Key to the whole investigation wrt getting SA off(I also believe he or a family member Murdered T.H.), i.e the timeline I posted verifies this, The missing cell phone records also confirm that SA is not Guilty. How much clearer can you get from me, also Lostinthesaus also say's SA is NOT GUILTY.
Clue KK did not produce official documentation of S.A. or T.H. Phone records, hemade them himself.


I thought 1 of the most important thing about living in a democracy is that you get to ask as many questions as you like.
Also why would you call me names like 9/11 truther, sandy hook apologist ect if you did not want me asking Questions.
You were trying to paint me & others itt as this type of person & that is just not the case, period.
04-04-2016 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
Besides, most states have incest laws. If you are a relative who can be viewed as an authority having sex with an underage relative is considered incest and I believe in my state anyway it is a class C felony which carries 10 years in prison with 7 years mandatory.

So he would have been charged with rape and incest. That would get him almost 40 years where I live with 20 or so years mandatory.
We have proof of KK emails that he did indeed have a inappropriate relationship with a client & more came forward but he got off on a technicality because his friends said that there was no case to answer because the person in question was not a reliable witness. And if the case went forward he would have been charge with Rape.

SA has never been convicted of A sexual crime his whole life.

I find it hard to believe that these series of events that you keep going on about EVER happened, because if they did MCSD would never have let it go IMO.
04-04-2016 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt Making a Murderer
They can investigate whomever they want.

He is not just a random ex-boyfriend. He was at her house dropping "something" off at an undisclosed time. He was an integral part of the search team. He was accessing her voicemail.

I agree that he is not the most likely suspect after a car was found. That does not preclude him from still being considered a suspect or grant him immunity to be physically present at the alleged crime scene.
Him dropping something off at her house has nothing to do with her murder or disappearance. It doesn't make him any more of a suspect than any other acquaintance. If he had a domestic violence conviction on his record or her Mom had said she had a bad feeling about him, okay sure, bring him in for an interview. Same with being on the search party and accessing her voicemail to try to find her. What do they have to do with whether he should be a suspect? Sure he might have done it to try to cover his tracks, but he might not have.

Okay, you agree he is not the most likely suspect after the car is found. Would you agree that police have limited resources? Would you agree that after the victim's car is found there are more pressing issues than looking up people she used to date, unless there some particular evidence is found linking them to the car?
04-04-2016 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25 Making a Murderer
I am also wondering if the Bones can be carbon dated or another process to verify the age/date of the remains.
How accurate do you think carbon dating is? For older samples accuracy is usually in the range of decades or centuries.
04-04-2016 , 07:59 PM
AP,

Posting from mobile, thank you for pointing out my typo as I clearly meant insinuating

      
m