Quote:
It's pretty vague, and yes, you could say there's a fair probability that SA killed her and that BD killed her.
But, presumably after SA's conviction where the State supposedly proved that he killed her in the garage, there wouldn't be a fair probability that SA and BD killed her in the trailer.
(setting aside the fact that it's virtually impossible that she was killed in either place.)
This is well put.
Add the "off the charts" conflict of interest by investigating officers (who BTW were ORDERED to not be there for this very reason) and "fair probability" becomes unlikely.
Now lets add the clearly documented instances of admitted and proven poor police work by Manitowoc law enforcement and "unlikely" starts to approach extremely low probability.
Further, just for funsies, lets add to the mix the shear number of unproven or circumstantial coincidences surrounding this case such as Lenk happens to find the key, key has only SA's dna on it, it is a SINGLE key found on the 7th search of same area, prior searches by investigators without a conflict of interest yield nothing and officers testify on the stand that the key was not there, Lenk happens to have ordered the blood samples, Lenk happens to admit being on (forbidden) crime scene moments before "magic bullet" is found, questionable vehicle discovery within minutes of having started search and being the only searcher given a camera, crime scene log inconsistencies (Lenk is the only offending party), licence plate call in by Colbern 2 days before vehicle is discovered, 6 searches by Columet County and no evidence found, single bullet alledged to pass through victims skull and brain has so little dna on it only 1 test can be performed according to technician, technician is same technician that wrongly tied SA to rape in first case, technician ruins test by somehow inserting her own DNA but allows test result to be conclusive anyways, written phone records proves that detectives who were not supposed to be on the scene have called her and requested (ordered?) her as to what she should find, same detectives on many hours of recorded interrogations clearly coercing BD's confessions, BD's confessions coerced to change when detectives discover they wont be able to prove original confessions (lol), blood evidence in car but no fingerprints, SA alledges planting and the evidence seal of blood vial happens to be cut AND re-taped shut, bone's having been moved, bus driver's conflicting time lines, SA very normal, non-nonchalant attitude in recorded phone convos, time of SA's recorded phone convos conflicting with amount of time to commit alleged crime, TH's vm is accessed days after crime is alleged to have happened, no other suspects investigated including the most obvious (people close to her), people with direct connections to County sitting on jury, DA's shady records and forced resignation, DA's suggestive emails after the fact, edta tests happen to be able to be created and performed in record times (by a factor of 12x) but judge does not allow defense to do their own tests, defense destroys FBI agent who "invented" and performed tests makes certainty claims about the test that are not possible and not consistent with scientific methods, FBI agent is also found to have "invented" a similar test that "proved" a man poisoned his wife only have the man fully exonerated through DNA evidence later (think about this one for a minute), only 2 judges presided over everything and ruled in the defenses favor on every single important decision when it came to allowing or disallowing evidence and further forensic testing. "fair probability" is approaching near impossible.
And since this is my post I'll just add a bit more to the equation and that is the disgusting behavior in and out of court by law enforcement and the prosecution. I hate to put it like this, but "just LOOK at them!" Ken Kratz and his disgusting demeanor during the press conferences, Fassbender and Weigert during the interrogations, too much to list about Kachinsky, Kachinsky's investigator's interactions with BD and his putrid fake tears on the stand (I mean wtf?), both judges and their clear disdain towards SA and BD, DNA technician's DGAF face when asked to explain the shear number of non-standard actions she took in this case, FBI tech's overly confident demeanor when stating that he was able to miraculously develop this test "to make sure he helped the citizens of Manitowoc County in case there was Police Corruption". Yeah, near absolute zero probability for me now.
One more thing... did I mention that they have already been caught doing this once before to the same man and stand to answer for their egregious errors and malevolent actions (crimes?) to the tune of $36,000,000 and careers and reputations ruined?
NioNio was less of a conspiracy/coverup than this. Do you think T high call downs FTW are just Mike Caro-esque online reads? What are you SA and BD innocence doubters seeing that I am not? It is NOT just that there's reasonable doubt and therefor he should not have been convicted. It's that there's so much evidence to him not having done the crime and so little evidence supporting it AS WELL as extremely clear indications of criminal activity by investigators that should not have been there in the first place who stand to lose everything if they don't convict him of this.