Quote:
Originally Posted by lostinthesaus
WTF!!!!!!!!! HOW!!!!!!!!!!
LOL - How can you arrive at this? These exact same officers have already been caught intentionally putting an innocent man in jail. Said innocent man is also same person they are pinning murder on. Said innocent man also has $36,000,000 suit that will not be covered by insurance companies because their actions and conduct in the FIRST occurrence were not deemed purposeful.
This fact combined with piles and piles of absolutely ridiculous circumstances surrounding the discovery of "evidence" against Steven Avery makes the probabilities of him committing this murder extraordinarily low.
How can you think he did it?
Well, knowing that the film maker had an agenda, and I was being led down a carefully carved path, I wanted to find some independent information. there are several other bits of evidence that were glossed over in the doc or not addressed at all. There is not a ton of info available but I've read a couple of the appellate briefs and such. Too much to explain away.
Yes, there are troubling aspects. Some of which I cannot get around. The cop calling in the license plate and confirming the year make and color of car does not have an innocent explanation. I am convinced he was looking at the car. I am also very troubled by the blood sample having been tampered with. But you won't convince me that the FBI were co-conspirators and fabricated the EDTA tests. They found EDTA in the blood sample but none in the samples from the car.
So, as I sit here today, I arrived at the conclusion he most likely did it. And the cops juiced the evidence. That is different than saying I would vote to convict.
Given the evidence presented to me, had I been on the jury, I doubt I could have voted to convict. Realizing that I don't have all the facts and didn't hear everything the jury heard, it is possible that I could reach a different answer.
I am far more convinced the kid got screwed. False confessions happen and I think this is one of them.