I don't know how they get those accounts.

I am pretty sure one of posters is a shill as well. I don't recall which one (I think PoorSkillz), but I made some comment about why (s)he doesn't just post over there and the reply was something like "you guys over here are stupid" (or whatever). The point is that the response made it pretty clear the poster was not part of this forum - regardless of the account or joint date.

aaaaaand boom goes the dynamite

And kept spamming the url of a website(he introduced us to) that is now accused of stealing money received as charity for the avery family.

Kratz is probably posting in some of these MoaM threads.

Make up the scenario as presented in the trial transcripts?

Actually looks like I just completely obliterated any claims that Colborn had no motive . Your response: "Made up a scenario".



I believe you have me confused with Kenny "The Nymph Collector" Kratz.

This is very creepy, dude... You know more about my posting history than I do! How long did you spend counting the frequency of my posts by time period? That's dedication! Are you Teresa's alleged stalker as well?

Anyway, I'm really curious about this astro turfing thing. How much do you guys think it pays to post in a forum of poker fans with maybe a couple hundred unique visitors?

And who exactly is sponsoring these posts? Can you please put me into contact with them, because it seems like a pretty sweet gig. Hell, I'll gladly start posting cracked out conspiracy theories that [insert name here] is the killer if the price is right. It's not like it'll change one damn thing.

Honestly, I basically came here because I don't really post on online forums, and I used to post on here occasionally, so I figured there might be good discussion going on. I was mostly wrong, but I'm still enjoying myself here.

Yeah, I already mentioned this. PoorSkills, fraleyight and fruitsnacks are more then welcome. I hardly posted at all until this thread came about because I found it intriguing and enjoy the banter and find the viewpoints from other people fascinating. NBD imo, carry on.

FWIW i've been accused a few times for being an Avery more or less.

Update from previous post regarding TH phone records.
http://imgur.com/V4l03nf

The Keys--Note that there is no wear & tear.
http://imgur.com/r/MakingaMurderer/Gx4Yz8M

Conspiracy Theroys?
http://imgur.com/r/MakingaMurderer/YpKPBpU

Thread without Skillz, Snacks and Chris Farleyight,

He's innocent, you know?

yeah.

I don't know though...maybe.

yeah.

I really think so here's why...blah blah

yeah.

yeah?

Yeah.

Maybe not though here's why.

I don't know...it's just all been strange.

Yeah.

Let's watch some more docs.

Yeah.

^^Yup so true saus, some ppl just don't like a indifferent opinion.



Was this you last week saus? http://imgur.com/r/MakingaMurderer/uPIAhrm

Regarding SA blood sample's
https://www.reddit.com/r/MakingaMurd...ensics_averys/

Why did you call me that?

Yes.

That was an open ended question. Why did you call me that?

A possible guess is that the majority of Chris Farley ' s characters were bumbling buffoons. Not saying that's the reason, but maybe?

My real name is Chris. That is why I asked. It seems he is a little more obsessed with me than I am comfortable with.

Several hundred posts with a decent signal-to-noise ratio about a very fascinating topic as opposed to several thousand with a ratio of AIDS.

I heard someone call you that I think...but it wasn't me.

LOL, didn't know that. Relax. Was correlating your SN to Chris Farley because your SN is weird, unpronounceable and hard to spell.

When you receive a call from a blocked number...then you should start worrying.

Don't agree with a lot of the points in this video and certainly do not agree with a lot of what molyneux says in other videos but thought this was interesting and especially how the legal expert explains reasonable doubt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsM1kBpzJSo

SA evidence photo's.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MakingaMurd...ensics_averys/

#

well all I did was click 3 buttons on the internet so it took me about 15 seconds. my relationship with Theresa is none of your business.

3,000 posts ago I pegged you as a shill, you tell me how much it pays. if you want to do an AMA itd be interesting.

The first six letters are also an anagram of Farley which would've been the easiest explanation.

I find this interesting, and it helps me better understand where you're coming from. Serious question: does anyone else actually believe this?


Anyway, here's yet another scientist's opinion on "The EDTA Test and the Testimony of Janine Arvizu", explained in layman's terms.

This also goes along with the other recent opinions from scientists on the EDTA test since the reports and transcripts have been released:

• The EDTA Testing- What was done and limitations
  
  
• The Subterfuge of Detection Limits, or, If I Wave My Arms Fast Enough Can I make All This Go Away?
  
  
• EDTA - Chad Steele Blogspot - A critique
  

Now maybe these people are just shills too, I don't know how deep the conspiracy runs. But I haven't really seen any opinions from scientists who have read the currently available reports saying that the EDTA test was junk (I know we had that one blog post from a scientist named Chad Steele who was basing his opinion only off what he saw in the show, but he's said nothing since the reports have become available). If someone can provide me with some good dissenting scientific opinions based on the reports, I'd be really interested in reading them.

It's ironic that Buting and Strang now claim that they wanted more science-minded folk on the jury. I think if that were the case, the deliberations would have been much shorter.

Watched The Central Park Five yesterday (IMDB link). It's a good documentary that shows just how possible it is for police officers to coerce confessions from completely innocent youngsters, and so draws some obvious comparisons to the Dassey case.