Quote:
Originally Posted by EfromPegTown
I think he made himself look like a tool. If you're suggesting they edited his media footage, I would entertain a citation.
This is simple. Do you think they used every piece of interview he did? If not, then they edited(you seem to think edited means manipulated footage, I could show interview clips of almost anybody with enough source material and make them seem a certain way). Then the question becomes why did they choose to include the things they did and not include the things they didnt.
I mean, or you can ask yourself why his viewpoint mattered at all. What value does he add? Do we think he killed Teresa? Do we think he was part of the frame job? So what is the point of his inclusion?
You have to realize they had days of footage, and they condensed it to 10 hours, so not like they had a shortage of stuff to fill his place(or they can take away all of his clips and have 9 hours and 55 minutes).
Every scene was a conscious choice by the filmmakers, and in fact judging by what can only be assumed days and days of footage to choose from, there is strong purpose to every scene they included. Why was her brother a repeating character?
And in case it needs repeating. I think theres a 60% chance avery is innocent, and a 99% chance the cops did some sketchy police work intentionally, and about 90% chance they planted evidence to aid the conviction.
And no peg, there isnt any "basis" for these numbers.