Quote:
Originally Posted by legend42
I get it. But the point is still not silly, since there is a very good chance Steven is somewhere *between* an emotional but still rational person who *might* commit murder and a completely demented psychopathic killer.
In which case the lawsuit settlement would probably play a factor in his thinking.
He is laughing at people who think SA is guilty, because why would someone kill if they are about to get 36 million.
But people who think he is guilty, think SA is a terrible human being. Future millions doesnt make a terrible human being a better person, so how is bringing this up some magic argument to convince those that think he is guilty?
The 36 million does nothing because bad people do bad things because they a re bad, not because they are in bad situations. The conclusion, if you assume SA killed TH is that he is bad, the 36 million is COMPLETELY irrelevant.
The 36 million's ONLY value in the case, is maybe showing motive of the Manitowoc PD to plant evidence.
There is no logical person who think SA is guilty who also think he isnt a bad person. So now ask yourself, would a person who thinks someone is bad, think that wealth will change their propensity to commit bad acts? The answer is bad people do bad things because they are ****ed up, not because they have nothing better to do because they are poor.