Quote:
Originally Posted by sirswish6
people keep saying if he did "this" so well, how could he have messed up "this" so badly? well, you saw the guy. he could have seen a squirrel in a field and just ran after it and forgotten what he was doing. he definetly isnt a criminal mastermind, which actually helps his case in many ways in my mind.
i do find it incredibly strange that there was no construction of an actual crime scene. i would have a very hard time as a juror convicting a man when the state was incapable of giving a plausible narrative of what occurred with evidence backing up their theory.
Yeah he is an idiot. They said his IQ was 70 Which leads to the questions of the inconsistencies. How could this moron cover up all of the blood and DNA if she was shot (and stabbed?) in his trailer or garage? And if he could cover up any evidence inside his residence why would he leave easily found evidence laying around just outside?
I think there is a good chance he did it but lots of stuff just doesn't add up. I also think its possible there were multiple frame ups going on. Real murderer drops car on Avery lot and moves bones to pit and barrel. Cops plant key, bullet fragment and blood well after the fact to strengthen case.