Seems like Steven's lawyers could have a much easier life for them and increase the chances of getting their client off if they just represented Brendan also?

I am guessing everyone believes that neither Brandon nor Steven should be found guilty on the evidence shown in the doc?

I may be a sucker, since I believed Michael Peterson, but I absolutely believe Steven in this case too, that he didn't do it.

No fingerprints in the car or on the key, no other DNA on the key. No blood anywhere except in her car, which doesn't seem to make much sense. "Hiding" the car in his yard. And that's without going down the alley of the county sheriffs framing him.

Amazing how dumb Brandon is. The defence often mention his below average IQ, yet the prosecution could turn to the jury and say, "statistics suggest half of you sitting in this jury have a below average IQ" and suddenly that might not be such a factor.

Amazing when the brother of Theresa says how the video taped confession from Brandon is so conclusive, when he hadn't even seen it himself.

Already a change.org petition to release SE: https://www.change.org/p/president-o...e-steven-avery

I think he did it in my opinion after finishing the series. I don't know about the Brandon dude but I think he saw something but made the other stuff up. He was obviously a deranged guy with all the crazy letters he was writing in prison about killing his wife. I just don't get how someone could of planted the car there and buried the body without any of the family members noticing if he did get setup on the murder. Awesome doc though.

I think you could get a lot past that family. That moment in one of the last few eps, where Brandon's defense team investigator is talking about how the family are basically boarderline ******ed and a bunch of inbred criminals they don't even flinch. Not even sure they knew they were being spoken about.

I would've voted to acquit both of them. That is not to say I believe wholeheartedly that they are both innocent, but I believe very strongly that there is reasonable doubt.

For Brandon Dassey, however, I do somewhat strongly believe that he is innocent.

What annoys me, besides all the MENTIONED evidence, in the case of Steven, is that we never got to hear talk about motive. I also would've loved to hear if Steven offered to take a polygraph like Brandon did. I accept that a polygraph is most often inadmissible evidence, but this is mostly because of the potential for false positives, not the other way around, so just for my own curiosity I would've loved to see and hear about the results for Steven (and Brandon who, we learned, did tell his lawyer he wanted one). One of my close family members had to go through years of emotional turmoil and bullying from other family members, until they finally took a (very friggin' expensive) polygraph test to prove that they had been truthful the entire time, so I have personal experience of how relieving it can be for the person to be able to "prove" themselves, and I would've loved to potentially see that here.

To say that Steven is deranged, as an earlier poster said, because of his letters to his ex-wife is a bit much. He's in a highly stressful situation and it's still words. The amount of people that I know that have said that in real life to their spouses is high and I wouldn't go so far as to call them deranged or suggest that they are capable of committing murder because of it. Bad, terrible people sure, but not deranged.

The brother of Teresa now works for the Packers http://www.packers.com/team/staff/Mi...2-f9580ded39f3

It was quite surprising how many of the family members of each side were able to be there what seemed to be throughout for both trials. Do they not have jobs to go to?

Interesting website, some sloppy grammar mistakes!

They got a bones expert but I wonder what difference the coroner could have made...