Where was the tyre prints if sa drove her around the property?

Clearly the vehicle was drove around the property. Do you think it was towed to the hiding spot by the crusher?

With that in mind, whether or not there are tire tracks just seems to be a red herring.

Finding,following & taking impressions of the tyre tracks is standard police work, noting where the car was is standard in any investigation of this size, not doing so IS running a shoddy Case & should result in disciplinary action.

Same as ignoring the cadaver Dogs.
CLEARLY we don't know because there's NO impressions. Simple.

With that in mind, do we have tyre impressions of the crusher or even if it worked, who drove it last.

If there are no tire tracks that obviously doesn't indicate the vehicle wasn't driven around the property because... The vehicle was driven around the property despite there being no tire tracks.

Yup in manti it is, with a kangaroo willis court & scared witnesses in sundown town.

In a yard with all the roads made of dirt, I find that improbable.

...and we all know how tyre tracks left by the same tyres differ very specifically depending on who's at the wheel.

As it is we have multiple witnesses who've made statements that Teresa drove off the property after her appointment, and zero credible witnesses stating Steven committed any crime against her after preventing her leaving.

The state's case is simply incredible from beginning to end.

Here's hoping corrupt scott walker loses tomorrow & the people of wisconsin can start to vote for judges who read the law correctly, don't have a agenda for the rich & powerful.

What mam done is pretty great overall, those 2 woman riccardi & demos? Deserve praise for bringing a spotlight onto the american justice system, in my 2 years of following this case & reading the politic's thread in here I was truly shocked.

If the US has that many problems with the justice system we in the UK are even more ****ed, as Y'all were the hope for a democratic country.

Meaning, in the absence of evidence 'anything could have happened'.
Other than all the witnesses trotted out saying they saw Steven at home throughout the afternoon and evening which was claimed as evidence Steven 'must have' killed Teresa and burned her body in his yard.

Just another case of conflicting, mutually exclusive stories trotted out by people whose only unswerving dogma is that Steven somehow, someway killed Teresa - and it doesn't matter how, or when, or why.

I'm inclined to think the dogs are reliable, as they aren't going to be worried about being caught up in a wrongful conviction lawsuit.
No. Why do you ask?

Well, one major 'alternative theory' is that Steven alone committed a crime, then next week it's a conspiracy. One day it's Steven stayed at home, then it's he drove he to another location. One day it's strangling, then it's stabbing, then it's shooting.

What next? Fired from a cannon? Dropped from a helicopter? Chopped into pieces with a laser? Could be. It's consistent with the facts.
None of which has anything to do with the maybe/possibly/perhaps/woulda/coulda/shoulda theory being handwaved at us by the prosecution and its fanbois.
Yes, and the evidence that Steven raped that woman he didn't rape was enough to convict him in 1985. Securing a conviction doesn't mean much when you give it a moment's sober reflection.

I get it. There is no evidence that would convince you that Steven Avery is innocent. Even if I had a video showing Ken Kratz doing it in the torture chamber he installed in his $350K house.

I believe that the power of T.V in the US is truly a powerful force over facts, that press conference sealed the deal for SA/BD.

Just look at the way msnbc/cnn/abc/fox all repeat the president's/politicians lies everyday....Then (except fox) at the end they refute some but not all with every commentator & pundit... Its pure propaganda.

Shoddy work, whether deliberately or through mind boggling incompetence.

But then, tyre tracks would indicate where the RAV came to be where it ended up.

But apparently the police didn't care about solving the crime any more than some of their apologists are.

Yes, the unethical press conference turned a lot of people against Steven and Brendan.

The power of TV in the US...We have healthcare In most of europe (not free) paid from (in UK & most EU countries) from your wages called national insurance..Its cost is very little compared to the US.
The above post about the lies in the president/politicians on US t.v. was mostly about healthcare, with the way the GOP has tried to repeal (medicare/obamacare?) 22 times or more for pre-existing conditions (unbelievable what counts as pre-existing )then totally lie about it a week before the midterm elections. ffs that's all the GOP talked about for 8 ****ing years of obama.....
Getting healthcare the Euro way takes a **** load of stress out of your life, especially in later life & caring for parents. And its pretty ****ing great.
Good luck tomorrow for all you US residents itt, hopefully y'all get a congress & house to be able to get a check on the fascist, so we UK residents can start to hold our brexit Gammon eating, *** packet fascist's to account.

Ok rant over.

Good luck.

Go back & read the thread then.

Being on a poker forum & implying your a lawyer, above all people you'd know that signs/tells are a gathering of facts & expressions over a period of time as the article explains.

Then just imagine the video has all the information you’re talking about. this isn’t hard to understand.

To convict someone you only need to be convinced they committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s it. If that is settled the rest can remain unexplained. That was the point of my video analogy.

Can you cite cases in US law where 2 defendants are charged with the same murder but different versions of the murder were tried in court similar to MAM & not this disingenuous b.s.

Lolol

I'm aware that that guessing at multiple 'theories' is something prosecutors do, and something which they are apparently allowed to do.

But I hope you can appreciate that from my point of view, if they can't make up their minds what happened, there's no compelling reason for me to pick one narrative and say I believe it beyond a reasonable doubt.

ETA: The judge or the jury should be able to say "Come back when you figure out what happened."

He was found guilty by a jury, just like he was found guilty in the 1985 case where he didn't assault that woman either.

It's just plain bizarre to be randomly accused of having a 'crush' on someone just because you think they deserve - like everyone equally deserves - a fair and impartial investigation into the facts.

I don't think anyone thinking Avery shouldn't be in jail would want to have any social interaction with him. He is obviously an uneducated redneck with a ton of problems yet being a killer or rapist remain to be proven and the only thing we argue about.
On the other hand some people itt have been creepy enought to get in touch with theresa's family.

Really, who was that?

My point is over your head.