[QUOTE=fraleyight;54439571]NO, btw im right here if you have a question you can ask me instead of being a total child about it.

...

This is what I said, although I didn't say "conspiracy theories involving this case specifically" that is what I meant.

You seem to have understood this anyway because this is what you said:

Anyway, "buys into" and "is into" are two very different things. I am not into the avery case because I buy any conspiracy theory. You ARE into the avery case because you do buy into a conspiracy theory.

Just like 9-11, me and footz are interested in 9-11 for very different reasons. He thinks there was some massive government cover up that involved thousands of government agents. I just think it was a terrorist organization and I try and inform others why believing the former is unjustified; misinformed nonsense.

No you are remembering incorrectly. The tracking dog hit on averys front porch described as "the red trailer" in the caso report and followed the scent from the trailer down to the quarry.

The cavalier dog hit on the barrels and wanted to approach the pit but couldn't because of bear. Also ( I could be wrong about this) but I think the cavalier dog hit outside the trailer too.

[QUOTE=smacc25;54440035] Why would you remove your quote? YOU said I was a **** face and I got trump elected? LOL. Idk what getting trump elected has to do with any of this (btw, I didn't vote for trump)

I have never discussed 9/11 in any forum nor have I a reason to dispute the FBI's claims or the american governments official explanation. Does that mean I'm a 9/11 ,truther, as i'm sure you said to me.
When I replied I think I didn't say I believe the official reports (my reasons, as I've never researched it) is/was I could not believe the USA would do/allow something on that magnitude to happen on there soil.

Mam is not a conspiracy, imo... There are actual facts that undermine the prosecution's case... My main point of mam was Why the Coroner was not let on/around to investigate this murder. If she was allowed on to the property to investigate I probably would not be here.
The coroner also made a very convincing statement after the fact & moved away from manti shortly after. Sorry I would quote stuff but my comp crashed & lost all my bookmarks from mam.

Q? Fraley... what is sandy hook? The school shooting? I only ever heard on msnbc a little about it, think it was when alex jones got cut off youtube.

[QUOTE=fraleyight;54440076] I was angry & should not have posted it.

I said people like you got trump elected, which I take back.. No need for petty insults, or politics itt.

Ahh I remember now.. Yes the track dog was on SA property and the Cadaver Dogs made a beeline for the quarry, when realised on S.A property

I believe the dogs came before the blood was identified or her remains were found. So probably 6-7th of November.

I am under the impression it is accurate that far out, especially if there is rain. That’s not really the problem, the problem is that the scent starts at Avery’s house.

You really cannot come up with any plausible reasons why Steven's blood could be found in those six places? At least a reason more probable than Zellner's sink theory.

Maybe Steven was wearing gloves and some blood seeped through the glove and came off upon contact with those places.

Maybe Steven realized he had a bloody hand and went at some length to try and clean up blood that got on the car but missed those areas.

idk, but there are more believable reasons as to why his blood could have been found in those places than the few the Zellner analyzed in her testing.

Also, the fact that no mix of their blood was found isn't any less incriminating if your theory is the blood was planted as what would have stopped the planters of the evidence from just planting a few drops of blood in the areas where Theresa Halbach's blood was located in the car. It makes more sense to plant the blood there from their perspective or at least some blood there.

after on episode, im convinced they had no idea hwo to frame this season and just tacked on ep after ep, I hope we see more of zellners side and how she tackles issues instead of it gogin all over teh place.


season 1 was pretty good tho won tlie

Obviously the tracking dogs are part of the 'innocence fraud' conspiracy corpus vile is always ranting about.

That's a major problem with the prosecution - a lot of things 'could have' happened. No one apparently knows for sure.

Has anyone explained 'reasonable doubt' to you?

You'd think sending a person to prison for the rest of their life would require a bit more than random guesswork involving an infinite number of mutually contradictory claims.

Yes, Teresa was in the quarry while Steven remained home as proven by every witness interviewed.

It's the 1985 Beerntsen case all over again.

[QUOTE=smacc25;54440035] What's your opinion on Sandy Hook?

You know yourself innocence fraud exists, due to your dealing with Knox's groupies, whose "guilter" lexicon you so enthusiastically adopt btw. It certainly didn't start with Knox either, plenty of previous cases involving murderers & child abusers whose low life fans along with unscrupulous film makers engaged in a false innocence narrative. I take it you think the netflix puff piece on Knox isn't innocence fraud? Also, It's only a "conspiracy" in the same manner as Avery & Dassey conspired to murder Teresa Halbach, or indeed any conspiracy in its most technical sense, rather than the flat out lunacy you consistently dribble. Nor am I interested in your evident obsession with me either, as such a creepy obsessive personality is a standard character defect of murderer groupies (such as yourself) in general anyway.
Such irrelevant obsession doesn't make your darlings any less guilty.

In other news Cuddly Steve learns not to mess with hardass hacks

You haven't the first clue what reasonable doubt actually means, you simply remove the "reasonable" part. To you any wild possibility no matter how dumb & implausible constitutes actual "reasonable" doubt. As I accurately pointed out, you don't know the meaning of words. You're stupid. Sucks to be you.

Meanwhile cuddles and his creepy nephew keep their heads down as prison gang power struggles ensue.

...You do realise she's got da herp yeah? Dunno how anyone could shag a nonce anyway, but whatever floats your boat...

So the scent dogs & cadaver dogs never once made alerts or entered the garage and the cadaver dog never once hit on the Pit nov 5/6/7 or even after SA dog was removed Nov 8/9 Only place Brutus cadaver dog made a hit inside SA property was in his trailor bathroom where SA blood was ( Scents stay on clothes if you have handled the body ). So suspect was in his bathroom.

And when the dogs were brought onto the property they made a beeline for the quarry area & their paths crossed at conveyer RD.
Brutus made alerts at & around the quarry area, took his handler to a shovel next to disturbed ground & was then removed, before finding more alerts...got it.

Yep She got it from blowing cocaine dealer Federico Martino & was allegedly trading sex for drugs.
https://www.independent.ie/world-new...-30405484.html

Shot of her funky herp sore here.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/maj...der-trial.html

Afaik though neither Casey Anthony, Jodie Arias or Karla Homolka have any STD's so you could always try them, I guess. Just gtf outa Dodge once you do the deed.

You mean raped. Banged implies it was consensual. It wasn't.

Well hey I guess that um *trails off*

Not if you got a job as an utterly corrupt hack prepared to abuse your authority by engaging in coercive sex with her in exchange for extra privileges it wouldn't, assuming you'd be prepared to eschew your ethics & totally chuck all semblance of morality out the nearest window, that is. All ya gotta do is pass the aptitude test & lie when saying you'll swear to abide by your duties and all the other wussy crap you'd have to lie about in order to engage in the aforementioned coercive unethical sex & everything could be hunky dory as you get your jiggy on & Arias eventually gets the needle- win-win

Yup, apparently the dogs saw the documentary in 2016 and got fooled by the Grand Innocence Fraud Konspricy, then traveled back in time. That's apparently what corpus believes.

Meanwhile in the real world the prosecution narrative makes no sense when we take documented facts into consideration.

Actually it's established fact Ms Halbach was raped hence Dassey's rape conviction.
Nor are we required to but only to be convinced bard.

By Dassey's own admission Ms Halbach was raped. Avery wasn't convicted of it but considering the several allegations against him from other women, I think it's very likely indeed he raped her & he's almost certainly a rapist anyway.

Or maybe Dassey didn't wish to admit at that point that he took part in Teresa's rape. He even asked proactively if the cops thought Avery raped Teresa in his very first interview with them.

Something seemingly odd to someone isn't exculpatory evidence & doesn't mean she wasn't raped. Plenty of murders have niggling questions, doesn't mean those convicted of them are innocent.

I agree.
I think he was present during the murder & raped Ms Halbach & prevented her escape which makes him just as culpable of murder legally. Rather than show any remorse he brags about his fan mail instead. He deserves 41 w/parole.

Prosecution narrative lined up with the evidence to two separate juries satisfaction which is all that the state needed. You don't know how courts work & it only makes no sense to you just as a bunch of pissed off jihadists perpetrating the 9/11 attacks & Lee Harvey Oswald murdering JFK & a police officer makes no sense to you. Nutty baseless laughable conspiracy theories make a ton of sense to you otoh. It's why nobody sane takes you seriously & why you're considered a fringe-a-loon crank.