Quote:
Originally Posted by corpus vile
Already thoroughly covered itt. Certainty isn't possible so the prosecution are allowed to pitch theories that line up with the evidence to a jury's satisfaction. That's it. You're simply raising bars as always for special little guys.
Nope. Your bitching about the
defense pitching theories that line up with the facts shows you have a hypocritical double standard.
Quote:
I'm simply asking you whether you agree or not with Avery that LE now didn't plant the blood. Do you or not? Also there is no "new evidence" & neither you or Zellner seem to know what evidence is.
Nobody but the person[s] who planted the blood really know who planted it. It's OK for the defense to pitch theories that line up with the evidence.
Unless you want to 'raise the bar' for the defense...?
Quote:
I haven't lowered one single bar in order to highlight my agreement with separate courts. I have no need to & not my style anyway. You're simply engaging in the standard murderer groupie trope of rejecting multiple courts of law for special little guys, while never validly being able to specify how the court erred, while innuendo & speculation is perfectly sufficient for others, such as LE or Ninja Ryan or whoever else you lot blame this week with your utterly pathetic "anyone but the convicted killer!" defence.
I'm not a murder groupie - that would more aptly describe someone like you who watches every torture porn film released in this and any other market and is compelled to blab about it on every available forum.
The only confirmed murder groupie in this thread seems to be corpus vile.
Quote:
rest of your sychophantic bs re Zellcat doesn't bear entertaining as she still doesn't know what a Brady violation is. Or evidence. Or what the word "exoneration" means. All she does is tweet contrary bs via "sprint" & "marathon" analogies, lol.
Zellner is a highly successful and highly regarded public person. while you are an internet troll.
Hmmm. Whom should I pay attention to..?
Quote:
I have no interest in Kratz & am apathetic toward him, nor does he have a rape conviction- there you go showing your patented inconsistency again. Nor would I care if he was later convicted of mass murder, for example. All that's relevant is if he engaged in any impropriety during either murderer's due process. He didn't. I totally get that you think he's a douche though.
Yet you defend every crappy thing Kratz did, like presenting to the jury theories of the alleged crime which he himself did not find persuasive. Kratz was also high on drugs during the trials of Avery and Dassey.
Quote:
Again zero evidence of LE corruption & your proof by assertion fallacy is laughed at.
Every intelligent person who views the videos LE made can see for themselves cops feeding Brendan the 'facts' that were later used as 'evidence'. Framing, pure and simple.
Quote:
Both are permitted under the current system, there y'go raising bars again & getting derisively laughed at in the process.
Yes, I know you are quite comfortable with lying on the part of police and prosecution.
Sane people disagree with your position.
Law enforcement and public prosecutors should be held to at least as high a standard as ordinary citizens, if not a higher standard due to their elevated power to ruin innocent people's lives due to their lies.
Quote:
I know. I analyse & interpret the totality of the facts & evidence. You're a conspiracy theorist who has failed miserably to defend your position in any way shape or form. You conflate defence argument with evidence, raise & lower bars accordingly, show different burdens of proof standards for different people & seem a semi paranoiac with a weird grudge against authority, by rote.
Again, you choose to engage in flights of fantasy instead of dealing with reality.
I hold prosecution and defense to the same standard, you defend a double standard.
I show that Zellner is both highly respected and successful, you denigrate her.
I offer facts, you offer weird
ad hominems wholly based on your own twisted imagination.
That's pretty much the difference between us.
Your unrequited infatuation with Steven Avery seems to be leading you to an unreasonable hostility toward him, and by extension anyone who argues for truth and justice.