[QUOTE=golfnutt;53017628][QUOTE=corpus vile;53012832]
.
Says you.
What? No. Not says me, this isn't up for debate. Says the courts as last I checked both are convicted murderers. As in convicted after a fair trial in separate courts by separate juries after the defence gave it their best shot. I'm merely agreeing with the established facts & conviction. It's not just my opinion, like.
Quote:
Well, accept for that part about officers who were only providing assistance located all the key evidence. And the ex-boyfriend who was allowed to enter a secured crime scene for the reasons of...
You don't have any objective empirical evidence that the investigation was corrupt in anyway & you're again showing utter consistency where you reject courts for Avery & Dassey, yet deem innuendo & speculation sufficient for others, like ex boyfriends.
Things you personally disagree with (press conferences spring to mind) is
not objective empirical evidence of corruption & you seriously need to realise this.
Not one of you, not a single one of you has provided anything credible, plausible, compelling or even tangible to challenge the conviction or support any suspicion of frame ups. Ditto for coercion, just a bunch of vague terms such as "clearly" & "obviously" and "universally accepted".
All you've done- all of you- is raise various bars & conflate stuff you dislike or disagree with personally, with actual objective evidence for your claims.
Avery is gonna die in prison. I personally think Rovner et al will be reversed & will probably go to SCOTUS, re Dassey.
We'll see what happens. You people have nothing. Zellner's motion was an utter crock. How some of you stubbornly cling to your beliefs while all the while providing zero of substance and zero evidence is quite frankly flabbergasting.
None of you advocates are fooling anyone who has objectively examined the facts & evidence regarding Ms Halbach's murder.
Your sex murderers are going nowhere.