^^A that time most ppl in Mantiowoc believed S.A. was being set up, I posted this info way back........... There was a site that posters changed to yup defo guilty after the KK-Horror story Press conference...
Ducit post from TTM......
Every time a license plate number is queried by a LE officer/agency for registration information, whether it be from an in-car terminal or via a call/radio to dispatch where the dispatcher uses their terminal to look it up in the system, a record of the terminal operator/terminal id/agency/time/date is automatically created regardless of whether or not any incident/crime/etc are attached to it.
For example (making this up): An officer follows a vehicle who fails to use a turn signal, he could pull him over based on the failure to signal, but is it really gonna be "worth it"? He runs the license plate using his in-car terminal/laptop to see if the person has warrants, is the car stolen, registration expired, etc... Registration comes back clean, no warrants on the owner, not worth it, so he turns at the next intersection and continues on with his patrol...
Even though no ticket, warning, or other "incident" is ever generated, a record of the "query" would be automatically generated that details when that license plate was queried, who queried it, where they queried it from, and the exact time that the query was made.
You probably already know where I am going with this, so you can skip to the bottom for the good part...
Back in 1967, the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) began linking local, state, and federal records such as these. Fast forward a couple decades, and the NCIC is a critical tool in locating missing/wanted persons, stolen cars/boats, etc...
FBI press release from 2007 celebrating 40 years of NCIC:
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/ne...-years-of-ncic
From the above link, BUT IN NO WAY RELATED TO THIS CASE, here is an actual example of the NCIC helping solve a missing person/murder case:
"4.) NCIC staff provided valuable lead information in an investigation of a missing female. The staff conducted a search on the missing person’s name and license plate for the five days before law enforcement officials had entered a record containing her personal data into the NCIC. The results included a query on the license plate from a neighboring police department while the vehicle was parked at a local motel. Law enforcement personnel checked the motel and found that the vehicle was still there. The motel’s desk clerk provided information that led the officers to a motel room where they found two men associated with the vehicle. They also found in the room a female who had been reported missing in a separate incident. The investigator’s search of the vehicle’s trunk revealed blood that was identified to be that of the owner who was then presumed to be a homicide victim. The police held the two men as murder suspects. The two subjects eventually entered into a plea agreement. Each pled guilty to one count of first-degree murder and one count of kidnapping. They were sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. Based on information provided by the murderers as a condition of the plea agreement, law enforcement officials subsequently recovered the body of the missing female."
November 3rd, 2005 (Thursday)
2:51pm: An incident number is generated by CASO, and the first entry, at 2:52pm, is made by a CASO dispatcher indicating that TH's mother is reporting her as missing.
Link to CASO Dispatch Log:
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...g-redacted.pdf
6:34pm: An incident number is generated by MTSO.
Link to MTSO report (see "Reported Date"):
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...estigation.pdf
6:37pm: First entry in the MTSO dispatch log, based on what info we have, is made that includes the TH missing person report/DOB/vehicle info/plate number/last known whereabouts.
Link to MTSO Dispatch Log:
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...patch-Logs.pdf
Notice how the top seems to be missing/there are no column names/no header or footer... The report that the CAD system who generate would have all of that, just like CASO's does up above...
?:??: AC claims that Wiegert (CASO) calls him on the 3rd and requested that he visit/make contact at two locations in Manitowoc County.
AC claims that Wiegert gave him TH's license plate number on this call.
AC claims that he did make contact at both locations he was asked to check (SA's and GZ's residences).
Why is Wiegert calling AC personally?
Isn't it odd that SA couldn't remember the name of the officer that he talked to on November 3rd? AC had just been deposed weeks earlier in SA's $36M lawsuit and is a big reason SA spent an extra 8 years in prison...
AC does not file a report until late June of 2006. Per the MTSO report, the last entry in the report is made by AC on 6/29/2006. So he is the first officer to contact SA in this whole case, and he doesn't officially document it until June of 2006?
?:??: AC claims that he called dispatch, via his personal cell phone, to have them verify that he had the license plate number written down correctly in case he were to locate the vehicle at these locations.
He can't remember where he was or what time it was when he made this call.
On the call, AC says he has no way of running the license plate.
A call like this would typically be made via radio, or, the license plate would be run from the officer's in-car terminal.
The dispatcher runs the plate and it returns to TH.
November 4th, 2005 (Friday)
8:57am: An "NCIC Off-Line Search Request" is made by CASO on TH's licence plate "SWH582"
Page 2 from CASO Dispatch Log:
http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...ted.pdf#page=2
If AC made the recorded call to dispatch before the 4th when the NCIC request was made by CASO, then the report that CASO would have received would show exactly when AC had Dispatch look up "SWH582". The only day AC could have legitimately made that call would be on the 3rd between about 6pm-10pm, and any time before or after that would blow his story to pieces.
Check this out, from all the way back in 1999 from the "Serial" case in Maryland. The investigators made an NCIC Off-Line Search Request on the suspect's license/vehicle and this is what they received. This is the kind of listing that CASO would have received (NOT RELATED TO SA/TH CASE):
http://undisclosed-podcast.com/docs/...est.pdf#page=3
TLDR:
Where the f' are the NCIC Off-Line Search results that CASO requested on November 4th that would show the times/dates/locations where TH's license plate was looked up by a LE agency prior to November 4th?
Why didn't KK just pull out those results and show that the dispatcher ran "SWH582" for AC on the afternoon of the 3rd? This was on "Off-Line" search, so an actual listing would have been sent to CASO in some tabular format.
Were the results from NCIC even turned over to the defense?
TL-TLDR:
http://i.imgur.com/0RnrdCL.png