The jury knows they weren't presented everything. Why would the prosecution withhold evidence...unless the "evidence" wouldn't stand up to questioning.
Of course the jurors would still agree with the guilty verdict. I don't blame them. Who would want that on their conscience that they sent a potentially innocent man to jail?
http://www.convolutedbrian.com/linge...roduction.html
Avery Trial Jurors Want Answers From Dassey Trial
***And they hope that the Dassey trial will supply them.
The jurors in the Avery trial had agreed to a pact of silence. But, the large gaps of evidence and the lack of a defined crime scene left some with a feeling that evidence had been withheld.
WGBA-TV interviewed Rick Mahler and an unidentified woman juror who are attending the Brendan Dassey trial in an attempt to feel more comfortable with their part in the Avery verdict. Both are taking notes.
They believe that prosecution withheld evidence for use in the Dassey trial. The huge gaps in evidence and lack of a defined crime scene are disturbing. They still agree with the guilty verdict.***