Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
And I assume you disagree that this pet theory of yours has a rather large element of 9/11 truthiness to it? Because it does. Quite frankly, it's ridiculous.
It's not a "pet theory" it is a guess.
1. The question was asked about how the car would be in LE's possession on Nov. 3. Because you have tunnel vision, you cannot appreciate that we are working on a base hypothetical.
2. The "guess" (as clearly stated), is based on that hypothetical.
3. Here are some things that may have been in play:
a. SA is under constant watch due to the ongoing civil case. LE is looking for some way to attack his case. Perhaps if he slips up (and he has a history of doing illegal or unsavory things) they can use it against him. So, on that day, perhaps LE was either in the area or already watching the property and they happened upon Ryan after he killed T.H.
b. We know Ryan had personally met with TH that Sunday. It is reasonable to believe he was still involved in her life and was hanging around because he wanted to get back together. If not, it would be very strange for him to be keeping such close tabs on her.
c. Zellner claims she can prove TH left the Avery property.
d. Zellner claims she can prove there were 22 call between Ryan and LE on Tuesday.
e. The evidence intake indicates the car was taken into police custody on Nov. 3.
***
Obviously, I don't know if any of that is true, but for the exercise of explaining how the car would have been in police custody on Nov. 3 and then "discovered" on SA's property later in the week, we would have to speculate as of now (of course, unless it is your position that we should all stop talking about the case and just pretend that there are no new developments - such as BD's confession being ruled improper).
Colburn who doesn't strike me as the smartest guy (no offense to anyone) could have thought he happened upon an opportunity. Whether you want to acknowledge it, or not, the SA civil lawsuit was a big deal and depositions had just begun. I am sure there was a lot of talk about these things in the police dept. and that the stakes would have been in the millions (I know you will discount that because you have read some opinions after the fact from insurance adjusters and lawyers that would state the exposure would be far less - however, you discount how office gossip works and that nobody involved would have been privy to a proper analysis of the exposure; they would have just understood the county was being sued for 33mm).
Under this hypo, one such solution to the problem would be to put the murder on SA and make the civil case go away. In reality, regardless of how it came to be, SA was charged with the murder and the civil case went away.
Regardless of how this shakes out, if LE called Ryan 22 times on Nov. 3 - there is something up.
If the evidence intake for the car is correct, there is something up.
If TH was 13 miles off the Avery property after her meeting, then something is up.
*** Anyhow, under this "guess" only 3 people were (knowingly) involved: Ryan, Colburn, and Lenk. Given the accusations of planting and how that may have been achieved, only 3 people would be necessary: Ryan, Colburn and Lenk.
Given the peculiar events of the investigation, only 3 people seem to have acted in a strange manner: Ryan (hanging around T.H., accessing her phone, deleting v.m.'s, accessing the property) Colburn and Lenk (discovering key evidence when they were to be excluded from the the investigation.
All the key evidence was discovered by Ryan (through his "search party"), Colburn and Lenk (through investigation - an investigation they were supposed to be excluded from).