[QUOTE=revots33;50676588]
Quote:
The woman SA specifically requests to come to his house, and whose last known location was at his house,
Not accurate. Her last phone ping was 13 miles away. Who said this was last known location?
Quote:
happens to be found dead elsewhere, killed by someone who has nothing to do with Avery or with any advance plot to frame Avery... and that woman's body and car just happens to be the one that is then planted at SA's house by the cops?
What day, even by the state's evidence, was it concluded that bones (not a body) were found and the definitive link was made that it was TH? And there is agreement with all parties that bones have been moved. Just not sure to what extent and what % of the bones were recovered. One tooth made it. Which is usually the opposite in that you have full dental records only to identity people. Why so unique here?
Quote:
Seems like a pretty massive coincidence, even by this thread's standards.
You adding your own interpretation about her being killed outside the property and the police planted the body and the car. How about simplifying it. She wasn't killed on the property and there are many ways bones and her car could arrive later. Leave out the police planting, even though I know that sounds intriguing.
Quote:
I mean you guys are getting silly. At least the Dassey stuff makes some sense. I think you guys are so worked up over Zellner's tweets that you've convinced yourselves anything is possible as long as it doesn't involve SA killing TH.
I didn't like the tweets and felt this was all done originally for her own publicity. When she said she was joining, I thought it was over for SA and even the viewers. I expected her to make grand accusations solely to garner more interest in her. Fame. She is defending America's most divisive murderer that has been convicted in a case that is ten year's old. They won't take kindly to an out of state woman accusing local Law Enforcement of planting evidence. I couldn't believe she could write that and I was dubious she had any planting evidence proof. More sensationalism at work to get the attention she seeks. She would then lose and just say it was a rigged-system.
I have found her work in the short-time to be extremely professional. She brought up her own theories, but was waiting for evidence. Which she requested. I realized that she has staked her own personal reputation on this one case and this may define her career. She certainly was well-known and respected and didn't need this case as a "win" to market to future clients or validate her.
I have read far too many legal briefs and documents and I was expecting sub-standard work that pandered to not guilty without any real evidence and misdirection. There were a lot of stories in there, but she did not back down from the reasoning why she needed xyz tests. And she will pay for them all.
The public is dying for news by the minute, but she is going at the pace of the court. Which can be excruciatingly slow.
I hope the tests she ordered produce what she claims. It will be an interesting 3 months to wait. What happens if they do come back to him? What would inconclusive mean? What about another person? Will an insider talk during this testing period and provide a radically different narrative than presented by the state based on personal knowledge.