OMG I'm sorry Custer I take it back post like this more:


I still maintain you were running wild with Oski and some others but maybe that stems from some TWOPLUSTWO BEEF unresolved.

I also maintain there are only 3 people saying SA is 95%+ innocent and none of them (ok, us, me included, but not Oski) have actually argued that point strenuously. I just read this bitch straight through the past couple days.

*slow claps*

omg he did it again

This might be an internet record for a person insisting a typo was a misspell and repeatedly harping on it.

quoting so PoorSkillz has to read it

If I actually did label someone a liar that would mean I am not ignoring them.

Besides:

Lawl and I arrive at Poorshillz' first response to me:



THE CIRCLE IS COMPLETE

And honestly, everybody, let's hear it for them!

If Poorshillz and Failey and Co hadn't been so adamant with their ridiculousness, I doubt lostinthesaus and marks and Efrom and Oski et al would have gone so HAM in refuting it. Their punching bag debate style has really done a great service for truth and justice!




p.s. and master and Bank and smacc et al

It wasn't one typo; I think he's misspelled the word a dozen times. I normally wouldn't harp on someone misspelling a word, or even 100 words, but when that person is lobbing personal attacks at me and also saying that I don't understand what a term means, I will continue to point out that he continually misspelled that very term (because I find it hilarious).


Also, I have not ignored 5ive because I disagree with his opinions, otherwise I would have ignored a majority of the people posting on here. I have ignored 5ive because I agree with revots that he is constantly "spewing semi-coherent, insulting, profanity-laden rants" while adding nothing valuable, and he has never even attempted to have a civil discussion. Combine that with the frequency of his posting and I prefer to just tune him out.

http://www.stevenaverycase.org/wp-co...s-Evidence.pdf

^link posted by poorskillz.

Do you guys see a motive here? Holy ****.

I mean he is out forcing himself on under age girls and threatening to kill them if they tell anyone.. Ya, that money coming to him was really keeping him in check. No way he killed anyone, smh.

What is an "issue of misconduct" lol? Everything he was charged with and plead guilty to had nothing to do with the murder of Teresa Halbach.

Of course the judge tossed it, you can't allow rumors and alleged misconduct or crimes he was never charged with or convicted for. That's like instant grounds for a ruling to be overturned in the appeals court.

Look how far you are reaching. In your ongoing attempts at degrading Steven Avery's character in order to assert his guilt, you are now introducing a report tossed by the judge that was filed by the prosecution that attempted to bring into the MURDER TRIAL acts of "misconduct" from over 20 years ago, 18 of those years of which he was in prison. He wasn't even CHARGED with most of these allegations, let alone convicted of them. This is just further proof of a broken system. The prosecution, rather than seeking truth and actual justice, resorts to freerolling a character assasination attempt so the jury can be further swayed towards guilty. It's absolutely ridiculous.

So if underage girls are claiming he is raping them right around TH murder, you don't think that is relevant here? You don't think their testimony may be important to judge this mans motive?

FUDGE YOU MOTHERHUBBARD

Also, lol at the bold.

Look at where the S and the A are on a keyboard. See that marks in the same post kept typing reasonSble. Factor in the knowledge that many peoples use smart phones or other non-traditional keyboards.

This sums up why you deserve that standing ovation. Honestly I can't thank you enough, and I only hope there are many lurkers that you swayed to the side of The Good Guys.

LOZL SOMEBODY QUOTE THIS

How about all the people he told that he was ****ing this underage girl? Is that important in judging his motive?

FYP

No you have a point. It is probable all his friends and the girl lied about him doing this to her for no reason.

LOL this is too much. Three consecutive posts propagating the same stupid slogan.

"All the people"
"Out raping underaged girls"

LOL - you lose.

You also don't seem to understand that testimony or any piece of evidence presented does not need to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. It is only the total sum of evidence presented that does.

So her testimony that he did this to her, his friends testimony that he said he did this to her is a pretty ****ing strong indication of his character and of motive to do what he did to TH.

#apolgoizingforrapistsitt

In determining whether you agree that the jury should've found Steven Avery guilty, those 9 issues have little relevance as they were not included in the trial.

In determining whether you think Steven actually did the crime, in understanding his true character and why the judge called him "probably the most dangerous individual ever to set foot in this courtroom", and in evaluating the documentary that this thread is about, those 9 issues are very relevant.

also corrupt judges not allowing powerful testimony to demonstrate avery is a rapist and ****ed up individual??

Something is off here.

LOL, I guess we're lucky the judge didn't allow a rumor filled report complete with unsubstantiated allegations then, eh?

Really? You're losing it bro.

You should watch the documentary again. It was actually proven he did not commit the rape he was in jail 18 years for.

"this guy raped me"

should not be taken as a rumor especially when others are saying he is confessing to doing this. And you better believe if that was allowed as evidence the people in question would have been put on the stand to tell what happened.

Maybe. So I guess for SA it's good that underage girls never claimed he was raping them right around TH murder. Not even one girl.

We're basing it on the below, right?