Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight
For example, even with the evidence that some of the stuff in the OJ case was planted I still would have convicted him and he still should have been convicted. Unfortunately for you however, there is 0 evidence anything was planted here.
What in the actual f**k are you talking about? There is a giant heaping steaming pile of evidence that it was planted. Why do you keep insisting this? Are you going to try and say there's no dna evidence that it was planted? And at the same time insist BD is guilty and telling the truth in his confession, despite a legit lack of evidence, DNA or otherwise, that he had anything to do with anything.
You "dont know" if Zellner thinks Avery is innocent? How is this remotely possible? She tweeted she knows who the real killer is and can prove it. Her co-counsel is the head of the mid-west INNOCENCE project. What they hell is going on over there? I hate to bring this up again but your ability to assimilate information seems extremely flawed, or you are trolling.
Does anyone still think this fraleyight account is legit?