Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Hope this clears some things up for you.
Um, it doesn't because the person I was responding to, Fraley claims BD's confession as gospel.
1. No trace of T.H. in the entire house (no response from you).
2. No evidence of bed sheets missing or burning (no response from you).
3. B.D. states they cut her throat. Fraley states the B.D. statement is accurate. Now you claim nobody claims the throat was slit - so, nobody can logically claim B.D.'s statement is accurate, right? Fraley has a bit of a problem there.
4. Interesting point. I swear I just read your prior point that "this was S.A.'s trial." I don't recall B.D. testifying in Steve's trial. Do you?
5. But the question is that if she was shot in the head, why isn't there more blood in the car? (you skirt this question entirely).
6. Bones were found in Burn Barrell, Quarry and S.A.'s fire pit. I suggest you consider something besides the prosecution expert's opinion.
7. Again, Pevytoe's explanation notwithstanding, there has been no solid evidence that S.A.'s open burn pit could have burned T.H.'s body to that degree in such a short time (if at all). I appreciate you are in love with law enforcement, but really, you need to take a step back from the sack.
8. And like I said, no trace of BD in the car (no response from you).
What you have cleared up is that if anyone had a remnant of doubt that you are wearing blinders here, that doubt has been erased.