WRONG you are just wrong because LENK knew about the PHONE CALL in 1995-8yrs before 2003 & DID NOTHING ABOUT IT, Colborn, Lenk & the DA all testified that this was TRUE(in 1995), they all new about SA innocence in 1995.

So SA's civil lawyers have said yes they was a strong chance that LENK was going to be added.


JUST stop with your B.S. unless you are in fact SA civil attorney.

By Sherry(Burp!!! Excuse me) Culhane, that she used up so as no-one else could test it. LOL but it ain't funny.
And since the defense asked for a witness to be present for them the prosecution refused.
But she allowed wait for it NOT 1 BUT 2 members of staff to observe her wonderful work procedures, IN the biggest case she had ever been involved in.(the 2nd biggest case she was involved in was SA 1St trial, that she also got wrong,remember the pubic HAIR).

But no worries Sherry(Burp!!! Excuse me) Culhane wrote down what that nice detective told her to do"PUT THE BULLET FRAGMENT IN THE HOUSE OR GARAGE". NOW THIS ALONE SHOULD GET SA A NEW TRIAL IMO.

#

HOW DID HE KNOW THIS INFORMATION WHEN AUTO TRADER DID NOT KNOW THIS INFORMATION.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW?

All I can say is if PoorSkillz is ever on trial, and the DNA test used against him (or her, I don't know) comes back with a contaminated control, I bet he won't be so cavalier about a contaminated control then.

What else do we know about the contaminated control? Oh yeah, the fact that protocol was broken to submit it as a positive hit and this was not initially reported. That's a huge red flag right there. Classic tactic we've seen from the likes of Stefanoni and Duane Deaver before.

I'm not necessarily in the Avery is innocent camp. I straight up don't have a strong opinion one way or the other regarding a belief in factual innocence or guilt. Should he have been treated as a suspect? Absolutely. Should others have as well? Absolutely. Did Avery get a fair trail? Absolutely not.

Real Crime Profile Podcast with Jim Clemente & Laura Richards

https://soundcloud.com/real-crime-pr...file-episode-1

#

The confirmation bias is the real problem with that test.

I mean their whole case is so ****ing circular its crazy. None of the evidence is independent of their crazy theory. Weird huh?

Pretty much this 100%.

Now on top of this add the fact that the actual evidence that was "collected" during the egregiously managed investigation is flawed/tainted to a degree that A) has a high probability of being invalidated forensically, B) had extremely questionable science applied to it C) literally should not have been submitted due to the Crime Lab's own policies. So even if Calumet alone had found this physical evidence, the defense could still present a very, very valid case for reasonable doubt based.

Additionally, the motivation for Law Enforcement to exact this level of corruption specifically and exactly on Steven Avery has to unprecedented. It's my personal belief that had depositions continued there would have been grounds for further investigations into the conduct of the entire MC Law Enforcement - perhaps much more serious than a simple insurer's investigation to determine policy coverage.

I've already posted Lenks testimony to demonstrate he did not know of the 1995 call. Colborns supervisor at the time (one of the defendants listed in the civil suit) knew but that was not Lenk in 1995. Lenk was not informed of the call until avery was exonerated.

Lenk testified to this and was not challenged in cross examination. Lenk did not know of the phone call until 2003

Yep, this is spot on. Judging by the way Peterson, Kusch, Cachinsky, Hazlewood, O'Kelly talk about Avery (all the Avery's and Dassey's for that matter) AFTER his DNA exoneration, it's totally conceivable that the Halbach's were informed from the very beginning that once again, "they had their man" and he is "truly where the devil resides in comfort". I would go so far as to guess that bro and ex-bf shady behaviour was due to the fact that they themselves may have done some things outside of protocol in order to secure an Avery conviction all the while believing that they were actually doing something righteous. This is pure conjecture obv.

Considering TH called her boss and told him she was 10 mins away from avery's house.. I would say they did know.

for oski,

Avery's civil suit

http://static1.squarespace.com/stati..._multidocs.pdf

Colborn was actually initially looking to talk with Charles on Nov 3 before Steven came up to him.

According to Colborn's testimony:

excellent quote from that Errol Morris interview:

"When people say that there’s stuff that’s omitted, well of course there’s stuff that’s omitted. At the end of it, I felt very strongly that there was a miscarriage of justice. Whether that miscarriage of justice is because Steven Avery is innocent, or Brendan Dassey is innocent, or whether it’s just simply because the horror of the lack of due process—the horror of life, the horror of how we treat people in the criminal justice system."

Try again. It was Avery Salvage (not Avery's house), where the appointment to take pictures for Barb Janda's vehicle was scheduled.

this was just answered two posts above yours. He went to see charles then avery approached him. This makes sense, either way auto trader knew where she was going.

What happened in the wrongful conviction..

According to the DOJ

http://static1.squarespace.com/stati...eview+Memo.pdf

I don't understand how any of you can possibly say that Lieutenant Lenk had no motive to do any of this. He's a colleague, employee, and sub-ordinate of those implicated in the lawsuit. His livelihood relied on a paycheck from a county that potentially could have been suffering a major hit to their ability to pay its employees as well as further scrutiny and shakeup as a result of the depositions and lawsuit, not to mention the reputational degradation of his investigative department, office and friends and colleagues. I've posted it once, and I'll post it again, straight from the judges mouth:

Someone should've bought the Avery's a digital camera.

What is circular about her bones found burned in a pit in his yard, her car found on his property, and his blood found in her car?

The only confirmation bias is from people for some reason determined to believe the police framed an innocent man by planting bones, a car, blood, a bullet, a key, and DNA on his property.

FYP

Why did the PD go back to the Avery salvage yard on the 4th & enter SA trailer with LENK ofc and still had no Idea if TH was alive/dead or any evidence that the avery family or salvage yard was a place of concern when they were involved with a civil suit.
Was the return visit due to a mystery phone call?


#

This part is just shocking man. How this guy retained a law license is beyond me. There has got to be some shady ass **** going down there.

Read their testimony. If it was relevant the defense would have brought it up. if the defense brought it up, i am sure its been answered.

Im sick of finding the answers for you.

I see...going to talk to Earl or Charles about Barb Janda's appointment. Makes sense.

Yeah, I mean, why why would they do that? They didn't have anything to gain or lose, right?