Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
You don't speak for everyone. I've rejoined the discussion in support of people like fraley, angerpush, revots, etc.
I don't recall any of them asking for your "help." Indeed, if I was advocating a position, I certainly wouldn't seek help from someone that was widely ridiculed for their work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Based on the facts I've presented you, can you provide an explanation for why Lenk would be sued?
Are there facts I've omitted that lead you to believe Lenk would be sued, and if so, what are they?
Or is your claim that "based on Lenk's answers there was a strong indication he would be added to the lawsuit" bull****?
Again, let me paraphrase what I read:
"based on Lenk's answers in the deposition there was a strong indication he would be added to the lawsuit."
I am not going to offer any opinion based on your so-called "facts." Because they are not "facts." The decision whether or not Lenk would be added to the lawsuit would be based on the attorney's strategy and what was in his head when conducting the case. Those answers (if anywhere else besides in the lawyer's head) would be in the file. I don't have the file and you don't have the file - you you are trying call "bull****" with your own "bull****."
Let me help you through this: This is not my original opinion. It is the opinion of someone else and it was offered only in response to another poster here asking if Lenk had been added to the lawsuit. Yet, that position as I read it was not really noteworthy or controversial. Again, you appear to be the only person I have read on this site that finds it unbelievable that Lenk could have been added to the lawsuit. I find it unbelievable that you would hold such a position given your obvious ignorance of how civil litigation works
However, two things we can take from that:
1. If Lenk was going to be added to the lawsuit, it would not have been until the other depositions were taken. Why do I know that? Well, I explained it already - it has to do with how civil cases are generally handled.
2. I also explained that if a civil conspiracy is pleaded, a participant (no matter how small their actions are in the overall scheme) is just as liable as any other participant. Now, that does not mean that such a conspiracy could be proven (or under the facts known to the attorney, alleged) but I offered that as one way to at least get others (including Lenk) into the case. In this instance, the defense of the case would be prohibitively expensive for Lenk and his insurance (if he had it) would not likely provide him a defense.
Again, your blind defense of Lenk is weird. I ask again, are you related to him? Or are you a law enforcement groupie. There was speculation of who you are earlier in this thread - that unbalanced reporter that slept with some police officers or something. You certainly are not doing much to dispel that speculation.