Quote:
Originally Posted by problemeliminator
I like how fruit snacks ignored my simple (yet important) question of whether non-******ed people ever confess to crimes they didn't commit.
Seems less probable it's a false confession than that he's just not telling the truth about parts. I think it's like 100x more likely he's lying about where the rape/murder happened then having made up the entire story. When he's being truthful he speaks without hesitation and looks up. I think the only time he looks the cops in the eyes throughout all the interviews is when he's explaining how deep the stab wounds to the chest and neck were.
In the May interview, months after the early March confession, he gives a near identical account of what happened. The cops loop back around to why she was in the truck. He basically completely stops responding when they're pressing him on this. I wonder where they took her.
Also at one point in this last interview they ask him who's knife it was that he stabbed her with and he says 'the owner of the house'. WTF does this mean? Isn't he on a first name basis with everyone in their compound? Very odd.
Again, people should watch the actual interviews. I don't get any sense of coercion or suggestion from the police. At one point the one cop gets frustrated and tells him not to guess, or if he's guessing to qualify his statements with "I think that..." or "Im guessing that..."
I'll say it again. Damn fine police work. Justice was served. God bless the United States of America.