Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST)

04-18-2019 , 07:30 PM
just a routine soul crushing
can't break your own record every day

this is suddenly must-watch tv again
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-18-2019 , 07:40 PM
Samantha was a jeopardy 10!

if not for James I would not mind her sticking around for awhile.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-18-2019 , 07:49 PM
I was kind of curious on this perspective, so here's an article/video about one of the contestants who faced him. Said she was the first game of that taping session so didn't know how good he was, then was sort of terrified/in shock during the game. Also said he took a nap before the recording.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...-time-greatest
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-18-2019 , 08:11 PM
Nap swag. GOAT
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-18-2019 , 08:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
Not sure if this has been posted, looks like a Jeopardy fan is compiling daily stats comparing
Holzhauer with Ken Jennings. Pretty interesting.

https://thejeopardyfan.com/2019/04/j...omparison.html
I didn't expect his numbers to hold up to Ken's like that.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-18-2019 , 08:30 PM
Holzhauer/Jennings over 11 games:

Quote:
Daily Doubles Played 26 21
Daily Doubles Correct 24 17
Daily Double %age 92.31% 80.95%
Average Daily Double Wager $9,993 $2,533
Total Net Gain On Daily Doubles $237,024 $31,600
Average Net Gain On Daily Doubles $9,116 $1,505
Those DD differences are pretty amazing
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-18-2019 , 09:13 PM
Déjà vu
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 12:01 AM
My memory's hazy but would it be correct to say that while Jennings was obviously dominant in terms of the buzzer and knowledge, his approach to clue selecting and wagering was fairly traditional/conservative? For example, he'd typically start a category at the lowest price and work his way down, and didn't hunt for daily doubles the way Holzhauer and others do.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 12:07 AM
Can someone explain "hunt for daily doubles", are the daily double locations not completely random?
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 12:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjosh
Can someone explain "hunt for daily doubles", are the daily double locations not completely random?
I forget the exact percentages, but I believe they are statistically more likely to be in certain spots on the board. They're never (or almost never) in the 400 row, rarely in the 800 row, and I don't think they have two in the same category in DJ. So players who are paying attention can deduce the spots where they're most likely to be.

I don't know if what James does is technically hunting them, since he's just starting at the highest value clues and working back for the most part.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 12:45 AM
~once a season in the first row, not often in 2nd, most likely in row 3 and 4, i believe more likely in 5th than 2nd, but less than 3/4. he definitely studied the actual data and knows actual %s.

he is definitely hunting them once he has a stack in SJ and all during DJ, hitting them/denying your opponents of them is such a hudge swing

SJ he starts with 1ks to build a stack(and take advantage of being used to the buzzer, knowing what category hes gunna pick) before hunting for them in rows 3 and 4.

DJ he starts with 1200s just to hunt them immediately as everyone already has stacks and you just want to find them/get them off the board

Last edited by ProfessorBen; 04-19-2019 at 12:55 AM.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 06:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SarcasticRat
I forget the exact percentages, but I believe they are statistically more likely to be in certain spots on the board. They're never (or almost never) in the 400 row, rarely in the 800 row, and I don't think they have two in the same category in DJ. So players who are paying attention can deduce the spots where they're most likely to be.

I don't know if what James does is technically hunting them, since he's just starting at the highest value clues and working back for the most part.
Any idea why they never appear in the 400 row? Why aren't the DD's more random?
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 06:57 AM
$400s are too easy to have DDs for the most part. If you find a DD on the top row, you should snap bet everything except in very rare circumstances.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 06:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
Not sure if this has been posted, looks like a Jeopardy fan is compiling daily stats comparing
Holzhauer with Ken Jennings. Pretty interesting.

https://thejeopardyfan.com/2019/04/j...omparison.html
Shoutout to Yeti, I believe he first posted that. Great stuff, been checking it daily.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 07:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SarcasticRat
I was kind of curious on this perspective, so here's an article/video about one of the contestants who faced him. Said she was the first game of that taping session so didn't know how good he was, then was sort of terrified/in shock during the game. Also said he took a nap before the recording.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...-time-greatest
This is great!
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 07:12 AM
I believe their are certain categories that are more or less likely to have a DD.

Something along the lines the gimmick categories (mi”did”le) are less likely and serious categories like European history more likely. Not sure where I read that or what the numbers were.

I haven’t seen any of this week, one superior area for Ken was in the wordplay categories — any sense of how our new hero is doing with these?
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 09:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjosh
Can someone explain "hunt for daily doubles", are the daily double locations not completely random?
I believe at the very least they are never in the top clue.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by riverboatking

ppl still love watching mr. freeze destroy ppl in foot races at baseball games and he hasn't ever even come close to losing.
Lol zero idea what you are talking about
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjosh
Can someone explain "hunt for daily doubles", are the daily double locations not completely random?

Clearly not completely random.

Someone told me that in the first round, the DD “will never be in the bottom row”. That’s partially key to James strategy of rolling through the bottom, potentially building up $6000 before finding a DD and maximizing his shove amount.

Can anyone confirm or disprove this “never in bottom row in single Jeopardy” statement? Since he told me that, the DD has not been behind a $1000 clue, but it is a very small sample size.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 10:20 AM
Found this after some googling

https://news.avclub.com/the-quest-to...ues-1828028620





Also in case you had the same question as me after looking at that,

Quote:
A few Redditors suggested that the low probability on the right side may have to do with the fact that the sixth category is usually a “gimmick” or “punny-type” category, which isn’t suitable for something as important as a Daily Double.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 10:28 AM
Based on this the optimal play is to start w/ the $1,000 clues in single jeopardy, and if you have a big enough lead, start with the $1600 clues in double jeopardy, otherwise the $2000 clues are probably better to go for first there. An argument could probably be made that if you are a pro at the buzzer scooping up the $200/$400 clues before going for the DD may be good but I think that's offset by the psychological factor of being able to take a $10k+ lead 5 minutes into the show and leaving nothing but $200/$400 clues for your opponents who have at that point lost all hope
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 11:19 AM
is there a reason why Category 2 is also low probability of daily double?
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 11:39 AM
No idea. Maybe it is the 2nd most likely category for oddball clues? I only really watch Jeopardy when these mega elite record-breaking players are on
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 02:39 PM
Nine of the ten wins so far have been lock games going into FJ.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote
04-19-2019 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by danspartan
I believe their are certain categories that are more or less likely to have a DD.

Something along the lines the gimmick categories (mi”did”le) are less likely and serious categories like European history more likely. Not sure where I read that or what the numbers were.
I'm a sports nut who snaps off any sports Jeopardy question in a microsecond and have noticed they never seem to have sports DDs. I've also noticed the trend you're talking about. Would be curious if there is any data on that at all.
Idiotic Jeopardy wagers (no spoilers before 6 EST) Quote

      
m