Quote:
Originally Posted by KansasCT
Been binge watching the first season of Twilight Zone. I'm really surprised by the quality of things like photography, writing and acting.
I have a question about the hitchhiker ep: am I supposed to get any clues that Nan is dead the whole time or I should just forget all her interactions with living people?
Favorite eps so far are The Masks and Time Enough at Last.
I also feel like this show would've been a lot better if it were a 1 hour show. Some episodes seem to have great ideas but can't develop them well enough because of the time limit.
Yeah, anyone telling you that the original version of The Twilight Zone is "lame" is someone whose opinion you should never trust about TV. No one working in the movie or film industries would ever say something that dumb. The reason it's been used in "hundreds" of TV shows is because everyone knows how great it was. And I'm sorry, no show other than maybe The Simpsons Halloween episode featuring the only happy thoughts kid has ever competed with what The Twilight Zone did (at least from what I've seen). Another great show is Alfred Hitchcock Presents, which was every bit as good as this show in the suspense/thriller/crime genres. I don't think that would hold nearly as well for modern viewers as The Twilight Zone, but there are many episodes in Alfred Hitchcock Presents that are, believe it or not, more effective than many great episodes of The Twilight Zone.
For the hitchhiker episode, I'm pretty sure she was having those interactions. The hitchhiker is death, but she kept ignoring him, and went about her own way being scared. When she called home and realized she was dead, that was when she embraced her fate and picked him up.
I think it's a play on the type of story that was told in season 2 of Fargo. The story was about someone who had been blown up by a mine. The person was essentially already dead, but didn't know it.
That Burgess Meredith episode is also one of my favorite ones, and it has probably one of the best endings I've ever seen for something like that. It's important to note that while there are certainly some weak episodes of the show, its quality largely holds (outside of the videotape episodes, which still usually had great story) from start to finish throughout its 156 episode run. The hour long episodes are all uniformly excellent from my memory, despite Serling not wanting to make the show be an hour long. Here's a little background on why it happened, and his thoughts about it from wikipedia:
Quote:
In order to fill the Fair Exchange time slot each episode had to be expanded to an hour, an idea which did not sit well with the production crew. "Ours is the perfect half-hour show... If we went to an hour, we'd have to fleshen our stories, soap opera style. Viewers could watch fifteen minutes without knowing whether they were in a Twilight Zone or Desilu Playhouse", Serling responded.
So the genius, Serling, would disagree with you about it working better as an hour, even though your theory was proven in season 4, where all the episodes were great, despite them not wanting to lengthen them. I think his main issue was that he liked how The Twilight Zone stood out from other typical CBS shows at the time. By forcing the format to an hour, the show starts to fit much more into the Perry Mason style (even though he mentioned Desilu), which was a gritty crime drama/law procedural, removing a lot of its uniqueness.