You do realise that we say those things about him maybe being spoiled in this thread right?

I have not seen a single post in the TV thread about Our House being spoiled. Not one. All of those posts are in this thread. Surely you are able to understand that by putting that line in the OP of the TV thread that you confirm all his most likely organic theories as being correct. It's not the posters in this thread that are the problem.

Remove the line before you spoil more people. I think at this point you may have spoiled more show watchers than any bookreader posting in this thread.

that's the thing, people have to be right in their assumptions sometimes. we just don't need bookreaders to protect us from the correct ones. it can all just remain unconfirmed.

still don't understand how you don't get that.

Then stay the **** out of this thread and don't tell people than he looks like a bookreader but you think he got his information legitimately.

I just don't even....

and lol at you thinking you not being a bookreader has anything to do with this.

You really are just out to get bookreaders and don't give a **** about who is actually spoiling what.

you guys are strange

Listen, I know we're bookreaders so you think we are evil, but just trust us on this one and remove the line. We can try to hammer the reasoning into your head, and if you still don't get it you can add it back later.

You are potentially spoiling more people than anyone else has on what is probably going to be the biggest reveal in the series.

So just remove the line and you can add it back later.

better but you really don't need anything about them imo.

OK:

What Our House posted is almost certainly correct. It doesn't matter how he got the info, just about every book reader believes what he posted is going to come true. Now it doesn't matter how he got this information. If he got it purely from watching the series good for him, but when you read this thread you are reading our conversation regarding whether or not he is a book reader.

So you are now savvy to bookreader inside info. You know that what he said is probably going to come true. When you go there and post "Sup bros I know Our House looks like a book reader, but he's cool." what you are strongly suggesting is that something Our House posted is definitely true because people were discussing whether he was a bookreader or not.


Earlier in that thread we got on your case because you publicly banned someone. That's bad too. What you did was say "OMG LOL that guy was obviously a book reader because what he posted was info only a book reader could know!"

I understand you want to brag about punting bookreaders, but what you actually did was spoil whoever read that post (I think chilltown). The correct way of dealing this is quietly booting the spoiled people, and hoping the post goes under the radar. Do not draw attention to book readers posting spoilers. At the same time do not draw attention to people we think might be book readers but end up to have correctly guessed what we book readers know to be true.

lol what. ANYTHING can be said ITT.

....and you made a post about him looking like a book-reader in the TV-only thread.

I don't even.

rolf at mentioning our house in the OP.

again, this is bookreader logic in my and many others humble opinion. they don't need your protection and they definitely don't want it either.

and for the record guys, and I do mean this sincerely, i have no ax to grind with you and i'm not looking to ban bookreaders.
that being said, my short modding history has shown that most if not all of my bannings have been because of people insulting me or making me the butt of their joke and i will freely admit that it brings me great joy to light stupid mother****ers like this up and watch them cry and drink their tears so a few of you guys in here better check yourself. fair warning.

Do you really think I'm amazingly enough?

No he totally gets that. That's what he's suggesting you do! Certainly don't draw attention towards Our House, there is no reason at all to do that. But you seem to like to draw attention to your moderation actions in that thread, which alerts people to the fact that there's been some indications that someone's posting has been questionable.

I don't really understand why people are going out of their way to assist the mod here, I think it would be a lot funnier to simply sit back and watch him continue to accidentally spoil people throughout the season, all in the name of "preventing spoilers." Would be an amazing and frankly beautiful demonstration of the law of unintended consequences.

I would have been happy to have all the bookreaders including myself be banned and I still would have given the mod my input. But given 27's attitude I'll be dammed if I will now.

Can something even be a spoiler if it hasn't happened in the books yet? Even if this theory is basically a lock there have been other good theories that haven't come true.

Honestly, having someone try to mod that other thread that hasn't read the books was a bad idea. That's not really 27o's fault.

his attitude and lack of understanding for what he is doing are the real problems.

anyone have a link to the text of the new winds of winter chapter? has it made its way to the internet yet?

We all love the series and don't want fans of the show spoiled, despite our disagreements with 27s methods.

Are these referring to the same chapter?

This.

I'm sure you'll find a way to persevere.



Why can't you all just forget the other thread? What is so hard about that?

because some of us put in a decent effort over several years to keep that thread spoiler free and we arent going to let you ruin that.

sunk cost fallacy. time to cut bait.

-------------- ----DEATHMATCH--- ---------------
----------VERSUS----------