Quote:
Originally Posted by HokieHovito
Can the show be acceptably unrealistic, but have unacceptable plot holes?
Of course. It needs to be consistent. If in one issue Superman is rendered passed out cold by a block of kryptonite and in the next issue he is weakened but able to fight by the same exposure, that sucks and we can complain about it.
It's bad/inconsistent storytelling to have the same exposure to kryptonite affect Superman in different ways depending on what the authors want to happen in the story.
Certainly we can complain about the inconsistency, but you can't complain about the implausibility of a flying man weakened by the meteor to begin with, because that's built in to the premise, you accept that unbelievability as being part and parcel with the story.
Complaining about "how is Dexter not caught?" in season 5, is like deciding to complain about Superman's flight 5 years into the comics.