My thoughts:
Quote:
Originally Posted by recondite7
On hang the DJ a few questions
1. Are we supposed to assume that the simulation gives the matching pair the same starting dates every time and if not where is the deviation supposed to come from. If it's all a simulation I don't understand how this would work without some part of the simulation causing the randomness.
Yeah the only way it works is by having levels of randomness in the system to change things.
We can tell that things are changed for sure by the usage of 99.8% within the sim which it would only be possible to use once they get to that % (somewhere around the 800th sim assuming the two misses are hit before that).
It could potentially stick to certain things like starting with each other and having the second match but my guess is the rest was changeable.
Quote:
2. On the 5 year period that he accidentally accelerated. Are we supposed to assume this was the only way for them to match? If he went a full 5 years it would eventually end so what is the game plan there?
I don't think we can make this assumption on either level.
1. We don't know for sure that it was ever set to 5 years. It only showed 5 years just before it started counting down, for all we know it was already only a few days but because he checked by himself it showed 5 years counting down.
2. If it did go for the full 5 years and this was common across the sims this would explain the high success ratios between compatible people. If two people were compatible, after a while they would likely work together to work out the sim (Amy already seems to be close before their second match) and then escape together. So if they do run the 5 year each time most of the rebellions would be probably somewhere between a few months - 5 years in to the relationship. They wouldn't be running away from their 'ultimate match', but would be escaping the simulated world.
Quote:
3. The people seem 100% compliant with this strange cult like system. The only time leaving or rebelling is brought up is as a couple if I remember right. If these are supposed to be the personalities of the actual people in the simulation, it seems like they are at least self aware that there is a structure and rule they have to follow.
I think there are only two actual 'agents' in the sim. The others are just computer generated characters (likely taking personalities and looks from other data in their db). The two agents (Frank and Amy) seem to have some sort of programming set in to at least initially accept the programming.
Quote:
4. What is the meaning of the 99.8% match? What does this mean in the context of the relationship chances of the real couple at the bar?
The simulations are run to estimate the level of compatibility between them, which ends up at a very high 99.8%. The way the algorithm works is by tracking 'rebellions', which is how they believe love and compatibility can best be measured. I guess the theory is that if you are in a relationship with someone life will throw **** at you and you need to work together to overcome it, so the test is whether you can overcome the system they set out.
In the context of the relationship chances of the couple at the bar, we don't actually know exactly how good the predictive abilities of the app are, but the world is technologically advanced enough to suggest it's probably pretty high. In terms of the real world application, the number they get is not really that different to a site like Okcupid which does analysis based on questions and then provides a % chance of matching, though we can suggest that Coach is far deeper and much more likely to be correct.
They are excited to see what is probably a very unlikely match score because it means they probably have an awesome relationship ahead of them... whether it's an 'ultimate match' remains to be seen.