How did that work? These people are dumb.

Having sis in the game just doesnt benefit the voters. Nicole, cliff, jess have zilch with her. Christie has multiple stated targets that arent them

Christie is a big target and Sis would have floated through for weeks

At no point in this season has there been a single likable player except maybe Cliff. I don’t get the live feeds but on another forum they say he’s porking Nicole. That true?
Also, to those who watch the feeds, do they still do the have not thing with slop? They don’t seem to talk about it anymore on the broadcast and I was wondering if that’s been taken out of the show. Thanks in advance.

You can always look at me and see home.

What?

Nick with one of the worst campaigns of all time. Tells Jackson and Holly he needs his vote then tells him if he votes him out and there's a battle back he will work with them.

No prank eviction !?
I dont know how they plan to fill the remaining weeks

Tonight's editing was on of the worst and misleading edits ever. Between Tommy's vote and Nicole "feeling" there's something more to Tommy and Christie it was unbelievable. Tommy along with a bunch of people promised to keep Christie safe as long as she stayed on the block since they didn't know who the prankster would renom if she came down. A wall yeller had a megaphone and told Nicole and Cliff that Tommy and Christie know each other by playing one of Christie's DRs about knowing him. They had to make her seem smart since she's so loved and has no redeeming game qualities I guess.

Also, Nick's view of Tommy is hilarious considering he voted out Sam. I'm pretty sure he voted Sam out at least but I'm too lazy to check.

Oh and Nick's campaign was so bad that Jackson and Holly basically laughed once he left the room and talked about how his campaign did nothing but make them want to evict him more but the show made it seem like he had some amazing campaign.

Not telling holly about his prankster power is a top blunder of the season so far.
They definitely wouldve kept him off the block in exchange for keeping Michie off the block

It goes along with her personality, but Nicole did herself a service by not pushing hard to save Nick. So many players have tanked their games by fighting a losing battle trying to save an ally

Speaking of that freak, Nicole, has she been on the block this season? It seems to me she has not. Since Tommy the **** won veto and will definitely take Christie off, the rumor is they’re gonna put Cliff up as a pawn. Why not put Nicole and her tight little ass on the block? Make her sweat a little.

Guaranteed. When nick sees this HoH comp, he’ll be 100% sure he wouldve won it

Even when michie has turned his reputation around, he’s tooling out. Telling nicole hr won that for her
“That’s the last thing I wanted to win.” **** off dude

I feel as though we have seen the same scene ten times.
Christie trying to deflect being the pawn for Hochie

https://ew.com/tv/2019/08/29/big-bro...mpression=true

Haven’t seen this posted but a LONG oral history of Dan’s funeral.

Baffling that Hockson has won three straight hohs and tommy & christie are still in

hey but at least they're evicting known competition beast and strategic mastermind Jessica, amirite?

lol bb21, one of the worst seasons ever


this is good **** though
season 14 was awesome, in the top 5 for sure

I hate that competition. Jackson can find 4 vetos and not win

You can find zero and win

Also Jackson is “throwing veto”?
Presumably to not appear threatening. And then he goes out and finds three life preservers. Good job

Cliff is an idiot for not using veto. Then again, Nicole the Tight Virgin is an idiot for not nominating Jackson and Holly. The fact is, Jackson and Holly are far stronger than Cliff and Virgin, so, from Cliff and Virgin’s perspective, having a final four with a couple that is much stronger than you so that your odds of going from final two to final four is virtually zero, then those are the very players you should get out when you have the chance. The goal is to win, not make the final four.

The alternative is going with Christie and Tommy, which is actually worse from a can we beat these people in a vote standpoint.

I think Cliff/Nicole (especially Nicole) decided to team up with Jackson/Holly over Christie/Tommy because they trusted Jackson/Holly were more genuine in their final 4 deal with them then Christie/Tommy were (which I think was a correct assessment). Christie/Tommy certainly would've worked with Cliff/Nicole to get Jackson out first but I'm not so sure Christie/Tommy would've gone after Holly next - I think there's a good chance they would've targeted Cliff at that point. I think they sensed the final 4 deal Jackson/Holly offered was genuine (which it was based on what Jackson/Holly have said in private and in the DR) so they went with it, which I think was the right decision despite Jackson/Holly purportedly being the stronger competitors.

And even the extent to which Jackson/Holly are better players than Tommy/Christie is debatable honestly. Obviously Jackson is clearly the best player out of the 4 but Holly perhaps isn't a better player than Tommy and I think isn't as good at mental comps as Christie is. I really think Cliff/Nicole made the right decision even though it seems to be working out better for Jackson/Holly right now...

I think this is a very interesting spot concerning whom to evict

yeah it really is
can make a good case both ways

How about the guy who has 4 votes locked in the jury?