Quote:
Originally Posted by HUMBLE.
Let's take blockers for example. We see data from the solver check raising hands that contain top pair with a high frequency. From this we might conclude that the solver does this because we block top set. We are giving reasons to data and I find that confusing because the solver does not "think" in terms of reasons that we as humans need be able to take action.
Yeah it’s true, sometimes we have to extrapolate or whatever, but our best guess is usually right. The bottom line is that these solutions are accurate, so even if we somehow attribute the wrong meaning to some aspect of the solution it doesn’t really matter
One thing that really interested me about PLO solver when first exposed is that they will run some small amount of bluffs without blockers (Pure air), depending on the situation. The solver is only concerned with realizing EV, it doesn’t need to justify its bluffs based on blockers or whatever (like a human usually does)
Last edited by +EVillain; 12-25-2018 at 10:33 PM.