Quote:
Originally Posted by Nobel1
Sry, maybe I am missing something but what does the single 9753ds hand from the Button prove?
I 4 bet this hands (maybe better connected) from the Btn a lot against players who 3bet too much from the blinds.
When they fold its amazing, when not my equity is not that bad, and I get a lot of more action when I 4 bet my AA. Some regs sometimes stack off with bad KK in this spot vs me.
Professionals (at least the best ones) do not 4bet this hand in this spot because it makes no sense theoretically.
If you check monker solver 4betting ranges in this spot these type of hands are never included. (The worst hand that monker 4bets at 100bb BTN vs SB is T965ds)
https://imgur.com/a/1LL2Gl1
9735ds is always a GTO call here
This is not an isolated hand. I simply posted it to give an example. They have a bizzare ultra wide 4betting range from every position.
To a highly skilled professional player, these hands demonstrate a strategy that is incongruent with winning regular or game theory optimal play.
The strategy is however congruent with the strategy being implemented by the 30+ other accounts with identical postflop statistics at all stakes from plo10-plo200, all of which also differ drastically from how known winning regulars are playing.
Last edited by HandOfGod666; 04-02-2019 at 07:50 AM.