A lot of good pieces but not nut ones
09-13-2016
, 09:33 AM
The game is 2 5 and is loose passive.
I had A
Q
J
3 in the small blind.
5 limps, I complete, BB checks.
Flop: AJ3
I check, BB pots (passive guy, but just lost a pot in the bad call), 4 calls and now I could be facing the nut flush draw and a set with that many callers.
My question is, what stack depth should I restrain from check raising the flop, and start calling, if I had 50BB the SPR is 7, and for 100BB the SPR is 14
I had A
QJ3 in the small blind.5 limps, I complete, BB checks.
Flop: A
J3I check, BB pots (passive guy, but just lost a pot in the bad call), 4 calls and now I could be facing the nut flush draw and a set with that many callers.
My question is, what stack depth should I restrain from check raising the flop, and start calling, if I had 50BB the SPR is 7, and for 100BB the SPR is 14
09-14-2016
, 10:05 PM
A bettor and 4 callers on the flop already. live pokers.
Running into hands that dominate us becomes a concern if there are still significant stacks behind after a flop check raise. I think we would be losing money in the long term if we are playing OOP on the turn and river in that spot (say 200bb +). Whether it is less unprofitable to go passive at those high SPRs and thus rarely take down the pot idk ..
A full pot check raise is around 50bb I believe. Thats my idea of the ideal stack here since it maximises fold equity and minimises the future bad spots.
live pokers.Running into hands that dominate us becomes a concern if there are still significant stacks behind after a flop check raise. I think we would be losing money in the long term if we are playing OOP on the turn and river in that spot (say 200bb +). Whether it is less unprofitable to go passive at those high SPRs and thus rarely take down the pot idk ..
A full pot check raise is around 50bb I believe. Thats my idea of the ideal stack here since it maximises fold equity and minimises the future bad spots.