Is clear for me that it would be an easy call if being the 3bettor and facing the 4bet.
But here I am not clear. We need 30% to call if we assume BU will call (we are happy if he shoves obviously) and we are 32% equity against AA and 4% 3bet range, thats ok. We have the equity to call but we will be facing a shove from AA with a player behind to act so it gets trickier.
Also we are putting more money in the pot wich reduces our implicits and makes higher the loses when we fold postflop.
I am right to say that we are happier in the heads up scenario being the 3bettor and facing a 4bet than this scenario with one player left to act behind us and putting more money to see the flop?
It is actually this call ev+? I don't have the Monker yet to put ranges and check, so I would appreciate your help
It's a hand that has a good distribution of equity against reasonable 3/4betting ranges as it's not going to be dominated too much when 3/4betting ranges contain a lot of high pairs which we are doing fine against.
Against most opponents this is a snap fold, but JNandez probably knows something about these two particular opponents (maybe they're ultra nits that only GII pre w/ AAxx). Given whatever specific knowledge he has on these two opponents, he makes the call as a favourite.
Jnandez calling a cold 4bet with J875ds. Can anyone explain me why? Because I don't get it
If u assume both players are holding AA hands,you definitely have enough equity to go all in.In this hand Nesselita who 4bets almost always has Aa,and even if other guy doesn't have Aa he is doing fine in 3way all in.I m not really sure this is super profitable generally.If 3rd player have also some kind of rundown and 1 our suit is dominated which happens often we renot in good shape.
BU 3betting range is 5%. We can asumme he has AA sometimes, and sometimes not in the respective frequencies.
Going allin is just one part of the overal ev of calling, going to the flop (most of the times 3way and some rare time HU) is the other part to consider in the equation.
