details. $40k loss without details is like steak without the au jus.
i must have lost atleast $100 per button clicked during the session. cant seem to find the stat "buttons clicked per hour" in holdem manager to give u a better detailed analysis of the session
Hey, if i may, i want to ask what is the possible evbb/100 of a decent (not the best) reg at 200z and 500z at stars, considering playing at nights + weekends to optimize the reg/fish ratio.
If someone's doing 10 evbb/100 on 100z, what could be a possible winrate at those 2 limits?
Thanks ))
I'm going to have Phil Galfond on the podcast today at 6 pm EST to talk about this weeks PLO After Dark play/hands, his new poker site & more if you wanna check it out.
On another note, what did you guys think about this weeks action on PLO After Dark??
I didn't think it showcased the most entertaining side of PLO unfortunately, but I think for players who are learning the game it was a great way to see different player styles and how they approach different situations. I think that the stakes needed to be a bit lower and/or an action player needed to be in the game for it to be entertaining to a bigger audience that isn't very familiar with PLO. We've all played in those reg lineups 100bb deep where it seems like nothing of note happens forever and when you add one -15bb+ fun player to the game, all hell breaks loose. I'm a bit disappointed that this week is what people got to see and hopefully the lineups in the future will be constructed differently.
I'm going to have Phil Galfond on the podcast today at 6 pm EST to talk about this weeks PLO After Dark play/hands, his new poker site & more if you wanna check it out.
On another note, what did you guys think about this weeks action on PLO After Dark??
I didn't think it showcased the most entertaining side of PLO unfortunately, but I think for players who are learning the game it was a great way to see different player styles and how they approach different situations. I think that the stakes needed to be a bit lower and/or an action player needed to be in the game for it to be entertaining to a bigger audience that isn't very familiar with PLO. We've all played in those reg lineups 100bb deep where it seems like nothing of note happens forever and when you add one -15bb+ fun player to the game, all hell breaks loose. I'm a bit disappointed that this week is what people got to see and hopefully the lineups in the future will be constructed differently.
I agree with most of your points, I think 7-8 players and more personality at the table would have been more entertaining to watch, smaller stakes could have also kept it more relaxed
I also think players played more vanilla/abc because they don't want to look foolish on tv
Part of it could also have been not the most interesting hands/flops over a small sample