Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisKid$Tough
Seems like even the nittiest of nits ought to raise top 15% of hands on the button in this situation.
I evaluate based on opponent skill and stack depth to determine if I think I am putting myself in a reverse implied odds situation where the table will put me on aces and I actually have aces, even if my raising range includes non-AA hands. I actually work to cultivate a nit image, so I generally want them to think I have AAxx when I raise more often than I actually do. That means that I am at a potential disadvantage when I actually have the hand I am representing.
It's also super-annoying to some LAGs because they are either reckless and don't recognize I could have AA when I don't raise or recognize that fact and get frustrated that they have to be more cautious instead of gambling it up. They are too addicted to PLO to ever quit, so instead they sometimes tilt because I take them out of their comfort zone.