I gotta say it, I have not encountered that level of both arrogance and ignorance in a strategy thread on 2p2 for a long time.

lol wtf are you talking about.
ya pretty arrogant and ignorant to claim i have a pretty good idea of what this kids 3betting range is and don't believe he's flatting with 4 big cards in his hand.

morons.

73% level

RBK has to be one of my favorite gimmick accounts

hes even better in real life I assure you, <3 jonas

3bet pf

The real lesson in the thread is:

"lolive"

Which Asian kid was it Rbk?

post some lol hand from this game OP . this is just a thread about a live read afai can tell

cliffs: op had dynamic w villain, raised flop for valu(even tho he insta regretted it) . had to shut down ott and fold river.

or I might be missing something

also lolbump.

hahahaha classic rbk

Well, ok. Let's say, for the sake of the argument, that you know that this guy definitely does not have either AT or KT (cause he can never call behind with weak aces, right?).

And I know you have to have thought about this, but please, enlighten me. You really think this Asian guy («tight, solid, thinking player») is going to put in the rest of his stack with worse? If not, then you are essentially bluffing... And you really don't need the T in your hand to do that.

bump

ez fold

This old thread was bumped on April Fool's Day. If the original post years ago had been posted on April 1st, then I would have thought it was a joke. That was some scary stuff going on with this hand. But, if I got to the river this way, then on the river I would have bet about 20% of the pot and folded to a raise. I'm using that about 20% bet sizing on the river here with the nuts, second/third nuts and some "logical" bluffs. What are the logical bluffs? That depends.

In other news, if riverboatking recommends a movie or a comedian's show, then you are good to go see it.

If your value betting what worse hand calls? T89? T6? Seems thin even for small sizing

No it isn't a value bet.

I'm betting my TTT77 so I can sleep at night. The majority of people in here were saying as played it is a check-fold. But I can't check-fold here, I'd rather bet-fold. It is a style thing on my part. And it is a player tendencies thing on what I've observed about villians. Almost no one at live poker raises the river without the nuts (and you can make a mental note of the few that do). So you can bet-fold with confidence. And on the other side of that coin, there are plenty of players in villian spot that will bet all-in here when check to. Some villains might go all in when checked to 100% of the time. Therefore, I'm paying that 20% bet to see a showdown or bet-fold with confidence.

Also the turn went check check which seems weird if Villian had AA although not weird if he had AT. So a small river bet by us stops villian from being the bettor with his AT.

Call my small bet a blocking bet. In the olden days we made blocking bets of 20%-33% pot. 20% has done the trick for me in keeping people honest.

It is purely style, but I'd rather blocking bet-fold this "strong" medium strong hand, than check-fold on this river.