Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis_MH
Ok, I'm coming to my fellow Philly sport fan for some help. I am writing a law-review type (its a seminar class so it won't ever be published or anything unless its ZOMG good and I suppose its "cutting edge") article which basically asks whether Major League Baseball would be forced to allow a pitcher who throws using a prosthetic arm, who has the talent to pitch in MLB (even maybe more talent than any person with a natural human arm), under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
I could not find anything in the MLB rules of baseball saying that the pitcher must throw using his human born arm or that he could not use springs or some elastic band hidden under his sleeve or anything else that would give him an unfair advantage except for "spitballs" or "mudballs" or using a white glove that looks like a baseball. Is there something I'm missing in the rules? I'm presuming that MLB would not allow some guy who throws a 120 MPH fastball using a prosthetic arm that doesn't tire, fatigue, or get hurt to pitch, but is this actually in the rules somewhere?
Finally, is there some sort of definitive study on the fatigue pitchers face - basically something which explains the common 100 pitch count and why it is important to keep pitchers on a "short leash" as it were?
I appreciate any help or direction you guys can point me in.
And if the Supreme Court does force MLB to allow a guy with a bionic arm to pitch some day in the future, plz to be making him a Phillie one time?
I'm sure there's nothing explicit in the rules although there may be some type of fairness rule that would allow the matter to be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Not an exact analogy, but off the top of my head Eddie Gaedel's career was restricted to one at-bat when his contract was voided as a making a mockery of baseball.
If I recall Baseball Prospectus did a lot of early work in shedding light on pitch counts with its Pitcher Abuse Points statistic. While the stat has some fundamental issues, you can probably look use that as a search point to look up some old articles (by old I mean around 2000-2003) to get some insight and maybe build from there to see where things have progressed.
I almost wrote a law review article on a similar topic but was too lazy to do the research... instead I just picked an easy circuit-split issue where there were already tons of cases and prior reference material.