Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Notre Dame Football - A New Hope

09-14-2009 , 05:44 PM
At least Michigan fans are awful as well.

On to a somewhat interesting topic, what is with the RR owned Fat Charlie stuff? Is it all based on the last drive? Because I thought Charlie called an excellent game overall and that is from a guy who wants him fired. I also didn't like RR's gameplan in the first half, but it was much better in the second.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 05:54 PM
What was wrong with RR's gameplan in the first half? He held Minor out because he's hurt and wanted to use him in the second half. He made things very simple for Tate because he was playing in his first big game on national TV.

He and Greg Robinson were committed to keeping Floyd and Tate in front of them, and they called the defense appropriately. Had the secondary made more gambles in the first half, Michigan is probably down a lot more at the half. As it is, they made ND move the ball more methodically and limited damage until they could make halftime adjustments.

The defense made some pretty good adjustments at the half, and Rich Rod opened things up offensively in the second half. Seemed to work perfectly. At least that's what the scoreboard tells me.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 05:55 PM
Also, Rich Rod didn't really make any mistakes in playcalling. Weis made a few bad ones. Obviously the final drive, but the QB draw from Clausen on 3rd and long in the first half was one of a few calls that left me shaking my head.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
What was wrong with RR's gameplan in the first half? He held Minor out because he's hurt and wanted to use him in the second half. He made things very simple for Tate because he was playing in his first big game on national TV.

He and Greg Robinson were committed to keeping Floyd and Tate in front of them, and they called the defense appropriately. Had the secondary made more gambles in the first half, Michigan is probably down a lot more at the half. As it is, they made ND move the ball more methodically and limited damage until they could make halftime adjustments.

The defense made some pretty good adjustments at the half, and Rich Rod opened things up offensively in the second half. Seemed to work perfectly. At least that's what the scoreboard tells me.
lol alright no need to bother
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise 60
lol alright no need to bother
Maybe you should actually tell me where I'm wrong rather than picking out one statement. The point was that the result followed because of the actions that I described. It was a perfect gameplan for the situation that Rich Rod had to deal with.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:09 PM
You did not run it enough in the first half, Minor banged up or not. Perfect gameplan though, COY.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise 60
You did not run it enough in the first half, Minor banged up or not. Perfect gameplan though, COY.
Expert analysis
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:16 PM
Blowing RR until your throat bleeds is a lot better.

You ran far too little in the first half, I don't know how else to say it. The offense was far from impressive in the first half. A kickoff return and one drive with some nice long passes, the rest was ugly.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:19 PM


Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:21 PM
Or maybe there are other factors that you're not considering that made Rich Rod game plan the way he did.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:21 PM
It was the (ahem) holding penalties that stymied UM offensively in the first half.

Lucky they were only called for 4 instead of 3 like ND.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:22 PM
Ah my bad, so he purposely had a stagnant offense in the first half? What a mastermind!
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shemp
It was the (ahem) holding penalties that stymied UM offensively in the first half.

Lucky they were only called for 4 instead of 3 like ND.
3 first half holding penalties, 1 of which was offsetting for no loss. The other two were on the same drive, which Michigan scored their only offensive touchdown of the half.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:31 PM
Yeah, purposely stagnant, more great analysis. First, they punted the ball three times, two three and outs. They moved the ball well three times, they just only came up with 10 points in those drives. They didn't produce in the red zone, they weren't stagnant.

Second, in Tate's first big game and with Minor injured, there's plenty of reason to hold the offense back a little in the first half. Not turning the ball over was a huge key to still being in the game at halftime.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise 60
3 first half holding penalties, 1 of which was offsetting for no loss. The other two were on the same drive, which Michigan scored their only offensive touchdown of the half.
The point was why they didn't run more. First and 20 changes the playbook, I'm guessing.

Edit to add: I reread my post and see I said stymied, so your point is valid with regards to that
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:33 PM
The point is that people are saying RR ran circles around Charlie, which is just not true. If you really think RR had a perfect first half gameplan then I don't know what to say.

I'm not even knocking RR hard or anything lol.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shemp
The point was why they didn't run more. First and 20 changes the playbook, I'm guessing.
That's one drive?

And is that really the point you were making? You said that holding penalties stymied the Michigan offense in the first half, that is just factually incorrect.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise 60
That's one drive?

And is that really the point you were making? You said that holding penalties stymied the Michigan offense in the first half, that is just factually incorrect.
I addressed that while you were posting. I agree that it is factually incorrect to say the holding penalties stymied Michigan's offense.

What prompted my post was you saying that they didn't run enough in the first half. I do think those penalties affected the balance of their play selection. If you look at the other drives you'll see a more balanced attack. So I don't understand the didn't run enough complaint, and don't think the play by play bears it out.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadMoneyWalking
The more I read and reflect the more it becomes clear that we were cheated. MSU will tell us if the team quits or not. I have a feeling that they're going to rally and light up MSU big time.
shutup, before i wind another 2 seconds off the clock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NozeCandy
You guys really should light them up. I'm just going to root for hilarity either way.
nah...ND 47 Little Brother 3 is what i'm hoping for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyTurn2Raise
FWIW, I saw this finger shushing about 10 times already during the season... only once was it called

that was a poor call by any standard
probably, but he did it.

i will say that if it were I that scored that td, shushing the crowd is just about the baseline of what i'd be doing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phildo
this picture is really awesome
and if someone can make it down to avatar size, i'd be MUCH appreciative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shemp
I'm going to have go with blaming Weis's predecessor for being a 3 touchdown dog at home to Purdue in Charlie's third year was lower.

There is a lot to choose from.
i agree, but i *guess* i can understand the venom right now. especially when you consider the 'holier than thou' thought process that these people operate under.

plus, blaming the refs is a lot easier than blaming your coach, who you all did backflips for a few years back.

personally, after watching the highlights again, my favorite part was the refs running off after the game, and the announcer going, 'looks like Weis is sending his assistants to chase after them, he can't, because he has 2 bum knees'...i KNOW he wanted to just say the word 'fat', but couldn't...

also, i'll have to agree with the congregation: franchise (not that he gives a flying ****) is not the poster that he was on saturday morning. lots and lots of whining ITT. it's not like we didn't have a little run-good coming to us from last year or anything.

finally: brian's post comparing charlie weis to a poker player was A+ awesome.

Quote:
To really discuss what's wrong with Weis I have to dig into the poker metaphors. If Carr was a weak-tight calling station—a guy who doesn't take many risks and can be easily dissuaded from taking them—Weis is a loose-aggressive donkey—a guy who just bets and bets and bets and rides it. The LAG (loose-aggressive) is a better player, much tougher to win against, but is prone to huge, fatal mistakes. So the problem with that second-and-ten bomb was not that Weis threw, it's the sort of throw he called for. Running or whatever strips Michigan of its timeouts and has relatively little value compared to a first down. A first down just about ends the game. I had a perpetual frustration with Carr's playcalling in similar situations because it was run run run punt almost without fail, or possibly run run third and ten pass punt. So a slant or a hitch or some sort of high-percentage pass that can break for a first down is a great call.
The bomb is going all in with a middle pair after you get a couple overs on the flop. (I was in the World Series of Poker once!!!) It might work. But if it does, it's not because you're a good poker player.

Weis is a guy who thinks "they'll never see my 4-6 unsuited coming." And he thinks it all the time. I know, I know: Gus Hansen exists. The thing about poker on TV is that it throws out all the "boring" hands and therefore disguises Hanson's insidious brilliance. I've seen all of Weis's hands. He's not Gus Hansen. I mean, even if you're going to throw that, why throw it against Warren instead of the guy you've been torching all game?
awesome.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:43 PM
Quote:
i agree, but i *guess* i can understand the venom right now. especially when you consider the 'holier than thou' thought process that these people operate under.
You realize you root for Michigan right?

Quote:
also, i'll have to agree with the congregation: franchise (not that he gives a flying ****) is not the poster that he was on saturday morning. lots and lots of whining ITT. it's not like we didn't have a little run-good coming to us from last year or anything.
Shocking, more Wiper fail. Outside of 1 post, all of my whining was done outside of this thread. And that was two days ago.

Luckily for me, I woke up Sunday with just a hangover. You wake up everyday with this drivel coming out of your mouth.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiper
and if someone can make it down to avatar size, i'd be MUCH appreciative.


my half assed attempt. i could make it a little bigger by cutting off a little of the sideline if you want.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiper
[...] when you consider the 'holier than thou' thought process that these people operate under.
oh lawd.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 07:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phildo


my half assed attempt. i could make it a little bigger by cutting off a little of the sideline if you want.
either riverman operates photoshop in the same exact lazy way i do (step 1. resize to 80 pixels, step 2. save in highest quality) or he got this up awfully quick.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 07:12 PM
riverman...that's mine.

pretty dickheadish move, actually.

phildo, you are the MAN. thank you.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote
09-14-2009 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise 60

Luckily for me, I woke up Sunday with just a hangover. You wake up everyday with this drivel coming out of your mouth.
i bet my victory hangover was worse than your loser hangover.

and not every day, just on days where we cheat notre dame out of their rightful wins. those are especially fun days. when the clock-operator/refs cheat notre dame.

because everyone knows cheating notre dame out of games they should've won is fun.
Notre Dame Football - A New Hope Quote

      
m