Quote:
Originally Posted by saw7988
Nothing specific to say really about JG, but it definitely makes me nervous to not have a guy being developed Favre-Rodgers style with Brady being old in like the most fragile sport of all time. And imagine how much Brady could teach a new guy rather than just developing him the conventional way.
Well, has any Brady backup ever actually turned out to be good? Mallett, Hoyer, Cassell, Brissett, O'Connell have all turned out to be JAGs when they leave. There might be others I'm missing, but those are the names that popped in mind.
Jimmy will be an interesting test case, & they can always draft a new guy to develop over the next couple years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod
if you assume the 18 was available, you could make the case that getting the 34th, now (having seen 8 more games of Brady + another half season of Jimmy G) makes sense. bc you've had the chance to collect more information on both those guys. you dropped 16 picks, but that was the price paid for getting better information
feels...like a stretch but maybe?
what I don't love is if Brady goes down, or suddenly declines - we are now the Ravens. or Dolphins. etc etc
I don't think it's too far-fetched of a theory, with some random attempts to sign him to some succession plan type deals that were rebuffed due to him wanting to actually play football mixed in.
I don't think we necessarily are ever that. I don't think Hoyer would be significantly worse in this offense for the rest of 2017 than Jimmy G if something happens this year, & if Brady wants to play a couple more years, what else can you really do but let him?
I feel like maybe I'm just trying to rationalize & this is actually bad, but meh.