Quote:
Originally Posted by SL__72
There was an article on ESPN a few days ago that claimed the Vikings had one of the 4 best OLs in the NFL... (the other 3 being the Colts, Saints and Jets, of course)
Also, PFF wasn't putting all the blaim on the coaching staff, notice the word "execution." They think Hutch specifically had a horrendous year, Herrera had a bad year, Loadholt and Sullivan aren't great run blockers and McKinnie also had a pretty mediocre year. The only person on the team with positive marks in run blocking is exactly who you'd expect, Kleinsasser, the tackle playing TE.
Stuff like that ESPN article confirms that the national media are pretty much clueless.
If Hutch had a horrendous year, I think it could have been bad by his standards, but he is clearly the best OL on this team & it is not even close. I think Sullivan pretty much sucks, Loadholt might be ok someday, but is not very good right now, Herrera is not good, and McKinnie gets by on talent if he decides he wants to play, which isnt often enough imo.
The fact that overall, we have below average players on the OL, just makes the scheme work that much worse. I dont remember much turnover on the OL between Tice's last season & Chilly's 1st, but I do remember seeing significantly worse OL play overall when Chilly took over.