Quote:
Originally Posted by cha59
Chilly & Spielman [...] were wrong.
I don't believe this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudge714
he isn't taking enough risks.
given their first two opponents being risk averse is the best strategy imo
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillNye
He was sacked 4 times or w/e yesterday, his avg was 1.7 seconds long before he got the ball out of his hands.
wow. is that avg just on the sack plays or overall? espn analysts were placing blame on pats oline showing how brady only had 1.86 seconds to throw on the 4th down play vs Jets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillNye
again i wont complain yet because the pass protection is so awful, but assuming this short passing game continues even when / if the pass protection is fixed what is the point of even passing? The Vikings should be running the ball every play unless they're intending on passing the ball down the field. A 3 yard pass is a replacement for an inept run game, not a better substitute for an already super strong run game.
their short routes probably just ensure linebackers don't just head downfield every play. it's funny because most teams use the run to set up play action pass, whereas i think vikings have to use play action passes to set up the run. just on principle they should allocate 2-3 1st and 10's per game to go for play action deep routes
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillNye
also give CT more carries ldo, Peterson should avg under 20 a game
i think this is absolutely wrong. i have adp on my only fantasy team.
that nfl map site shows the L.A. area is supposed to have the SF @ MIN game, but my cable guide is showing NYG @ TB. WTF? Who the hell watches the Giants or Bucs here? Really don't want to get directv just to get vikings games but i might be forced to.
i was surprised we're 7 point favorites vs niners. that's encouraging.